Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion

By Jennifer L. Berdahl, P. V. Martorana. 2006

217 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a17780314a4d85cc8917a4584b936653687b3365

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Interpersonal Power (2015, background): “…who were randomly assigned to lead discussion groups about a controversial social issue experienced more positive emotions, such as happiness and interest, compared to low-power participants who reported experiencing more negative emotions, such as discomfort and fear (Berdahl & Martorana, 2006).”
Social power and emotional experience: Actor and partner effects within dyadic interactions (2008, background): “Experimental and role-based studies have operationalized high power as an individual’s ability to influence a partner who in turn has limited ability to influence the high power individual ( Berdahl & Martorana, 2006; Chen, Lee-Chai, & Bargh, 2001; Hecht & LaFrance, 1998).”
Gender, emotion and power in work relationships (2011, background): “Power increases the experience and expression of positive emotions (Anderson & Berdahl, 2002; Berdahl & Martorana, 2006; Keltner, Gruenfeld, & Anderson, 2003; Langner & Keltner, 2008), gives people greater latitude in the type, intensity and range of emotions they can display in their social…”
The riddle of heterarchy: : power transitions in cross-functional teams (2014, unknown): “According to approach-inhibition theories of power (Fiske, 2004; Berdahl & Martorana, 2006; Flynn, Galinsky, Gruenfeld, & Magee, 2003; Flynn, Gruenfeld, Molm, & Polzer, 2011; Keltner, Gruenfeld, & Anderson, 2003; Lammers, Galinsky, Grordijn, & Otten, 2008), individuals associate power with certain…”
8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status (2008, unknown): “Similarly, those with greater power are more likely to express their private opinions and true attitudes (Anderson & Berdahl, 2002 ; Berdahl & Martorana, 2006 ; Brinol, Petty, Valle, Rucker, & Becerra, 2007 ; Galinsky, Magee, Gruenfeld, Whitson, & Liljenquist, in press).”
POWER INFLUENCES SELF-ESTEEM (2007, background): “Consistent with the idea of the approach system activation, people high in power experience more positive and less negative emotion and are more likely to perceive rewards (Anderson & Berdhal, 2002; Berdahl & Martorana, 2006 ).”
When Power Makes Others Speechless: The Negative Impact of Leader Power on Team Performance (2013, background): “First, the psychological experience of power leads individuals to be more inclined to express their attitudes and opinions in group contexts (Anderson & Berdahl, 2002; Berdahl & Martorana, 2006).”
The detrimental effects of power on confidence, advice taking, and accuracy (2011, background): “We regarded this as important to do given past research showing relationships between power and affect (Berdahl & Martorana, 2006) and between affect and advice taking (Gino & Schweitzer, 2008). er on confidence, advice taking, and accuracy.”
The Nonconscious Nature of Power: Cues and Consequences (2010, background): “Berdahl and Martorana (2006) hypothesized that power will only affect emotional responses during social interactions that are important or meaningful.”
Serving the Self From the Seat of Power (2014, background): “People who wield power experience more positive emotions and optimism (Anderson & Galinsky, 2006; Berdahl & Martorana, 2006), enjoy a greater sense of control (Anderson, John, & Keltner, 2012; Fast, Gruenfeld, Sivanathan, & Galinsky, 2009; Inesi, Botti, Dubois, Rucker, & Galinsky, 2011), and feel…”
Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources (2017, background): “Moreover, people with low-power experience more negative affect than their high-power peers (Berdahl and Martorana, 2006).”
Leader power and leader self-serving behavior: The role of effective leadership beliefs and performance information (2010, background): “…(Galinsky, Magee, Inesi, & Gruenfeld, 2006), to respond less to others’ emotional displays (van Kleef, De Dreu, Pietroni, & Manstead, 2006), and to be less likely to fall prey to influence attempts than the powerless (Anderson & Berdahl, 2002; Berdahl & Martorana, 2006; Galinsky et al., 2008).”
Strategic Use of Emotional Intelligence in Organizational Settings: Exploring the Dark Side (2010, background): “Individuals high in power tend to experience and express more positive emotions than do low power individuals, and also are more likely to be disinhibited in the expression of opinions during group discussion (Berdahl & Martorana, 2006).”