Interpersonal Power
By Rachel E. Sturm, John Antonakis. 2015
206 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93a369f280fff19ef4ab749a82066a6b37f8de94
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
- Bernardo F. Quiroga
- Sirio Lonati
- Christian Zehnder
- Nicolas Bastardoz
- Boas Shamir
- A. Erez
- John Antonakis
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Philippe Jacquart
- John Antonakis
- Andromachi Athanasopoulou
- S. Dopson
- Boas Shamir
- Nicolas Bastardoz
- Christian Zehnder
- Bernardo F. Quiroga
Citations in the corpus
- Charisma: An Ill-Defined and Ill-Measured Gift (2016, background): “It is not difficult to see why this word was chosen to undergird and describe a type of leadership that can give leaders great power, that is, “the discretion and the means to asymmetrically enforce one’s will” over entities like organizations or individuals (Sturm & Antonakis 2015, p. 139).”
- On doing relevant and rigorous experiments: Review and recommendations (2018, background): “…partially solves this issue, yet such a procedure is not riskless either: If manipulation checks clearly reveal the purpose of the experiment, participants might report biased responses in the manipulation check, because they internalized the demand of the experimenter (Sturm & Antonakis, 2015).”
- A systematic review of executive coaching outcomes: Is it the journey or the destination that matters the most? (2018, background): “Subjects are likely to change behavior compared to how they would have behaved had they not known about the research (see Sturm and Antonakis (2015) on the pitfalls of priming participants in experimental designs).”
- HEAVY IS THE HEAD THAT WEARS THE CROWN: AN ACTOR-CENTRIC APPROACH TO DAILY PSYCHOLOGICAL POWER, ABUSIVE LEADER BEHAVIOR, AND PERCEIVED INCIVILITY (2017, background): “…& Stapel, 2009; Lammers, Stoker, & Stapel, 2009; Rucker, Dubois, & Galinsky, 2011; Rucker & Galinsky, 2008), and (2) because it has been recognized as one of the dominant approaches to manipulating psychological power in organizational studies (Anderson & Brion, 2014; Sturm & Antonakis, 2015).”