Commenting on research results in applied linguistics and education: A comparative genre-based investigation

By J. Lim. 2010

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9fa288cdf8ded205c37789ab1ce645fb5b53645e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Paul Thompson
2. Hesamoddin Shahriari
3. Ahmad Ansarifar
4. R. Pishghadam
5. Ken Hyland
6. Jim McKinley
7. Shih-Chieh Chien
8. R. Ruegg

In Education

1. Paul Thompson
2. Hesamoddin Shahriari
3. Ahmad Ansarifar
4. R. Pishghadam
5. Ken Hyland
6. Raffaella Negretti
7. Sadiq Abdulwahed Ahmed Ismail
8. C. Weir

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Paul Thompson
2. Hesamoddin Shahriari
3. Ahmad Ansarifar
4. R. Pishghadam
5. Ken Hyland
6. Raffaella Negretti
7. Douglas Biber
8. A. Molino

Citations in the corpus

• Phrasal complexity in academic writing: A comparison of abstracts written by graduate students and expert writers in applied linguistics (2018, background): “Such a Kappa value in discourse-based coding decisions indicates that the inter-coder agreement was outstanding (see also Landis & Koch, 1977; Lim, 2010; Lim, Loi, Hashim, & Liu, 2015).”
• The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (2016, background): “Instead, he argues that it also reveals the marketisation and neo-liberalisation of higher education, which is most definitely not a neutral activity (Pennycook, 1997, pp. 258–259).”