Informal Formative Assessment and Scientific Inquiry: Exploring Teachers' Practices and Student Learning
By Maria Araceli Ruiz-Primo, Erin Marie Furtak. 2006
208 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e594ae8a99be85a277913df2bec94fd0f0d32cd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Maria Araceli Ruiz-Primo
- R. Shavelson
- Sofie M. M. Loyens
- Remy M. J. P. Rikers
- L. Wijnia
- Luke K. Fryer
- Martijn J. M. Leenknecht
- M. Köhlen
In Education
- Maria Araceli Ruiz-Primo
- Erin Marie Furtak
- R. Shavelson
- Yue Yin
- Remy M. J. P. Rikers
- L. Wijnia
- Sofie M. M. Loyens
- Luke K. Fryer
Citations in the corpus
- Formative assessment as practice: the role of students’ motivation (2020, background): “Feedback is an evident source of information for attribution as it helps to identify and solve students’ misconceptions during classroom discussions (Ruiz-Primo and Furtak 2006; Black and Wiliam 2009; Wylie and Lyon 2015).”
- A Critical Review of Research on Formative Assessment: The Limited Scientific Evidence of the Impact of Formative Assessment in Education (2009, background): “Ruiz-Primo and Furtak (2006) found that students in classrooms where teachers engaged in assessment discussions performed significantly higher on embedded assessments and post-tests.”
- On the Fidelity of Implementing Embedded Formative Assessments and Its Relation to Student Learning (2008, background): “The teacher’s role therefore is to promote reasoning, by asking students to provide explanations and justifications, probing for deeper meaning, and comparing/contrasting student ideas (Ruiz-Primo & Furtak, 2006; 2007).”