Gender Differences in Compulsory School Pupils' L2 Self-Concepts: A Longitudinal Study.
By Alastair Henry. 2009
108 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9bacdc70d10219d856b92c8fcc25eba16adb9a9b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
In Language and Linguistics
- D. Lasagabaster
- Letty Chan
- Z. Dörnyei
- A. Heras
- Alastair Henry
- C. Cliffordson
- Ali H. Al-Hoorie
- M. Lamb
In Literature and Literary Theory
- D. Lasagabaster
- A. Heras
- Letty Chan
- Alastair Henry
- C. Cliffordson
- Z. Dörnyei
- Ali H. Al-Hoorie
- Mostafa Papi
Citations in the corpus
- Contexts of possibility in simultaneous language learning: using the L2 Motivational Self System to assess the impact of global English (2010, methodology): “…as in Csizér and Dörnyei’s (2005) study, most of these pupils were boys, a result which accords well with other studies that have investigated gender differences in L2 motivation (Dörnyei and Csizér 2002; Henry 2009; Henry and Apelgren 2008; Williams, Burden, and Lanvers 2002; Wright 1999).”
- The relationship between motivation, gender, L1 and possible selves in English-medium instruction (2016, methodology): “…learning foreign languages is still perceived as feminine terrain, a belief that is underpinned by empirical evidence that shows that female students tend to be more motivated than their male counterparts (Carr & Pauwels, 2006; Henry, 2009, 2012; Kissau, 2006; Meece et al., 2006; Ryan, 2009).”
- Motivation, Gender, and Possible Selves (2013, background): “…Gardner & Lambert, 1972; Phillips & Filmer-Sankey, 1993; Sung & Padilla, 1998; Williams, Burden, & Lanvers, 2002), as well as on measures of language-speaking/using self-concepts in possible selves paradigm research (Henry, 2009; Henry & Apelgren, 2008; Kim, 2009; Kim & Kim, 2011; Ryan, 2009).”
- The impact of CLIL on affective factors and vocabulary learning (2015, methodology): “In order to measure motivation and selfesteem, two multi-item questionnaires were developed based on previous studies in the area of L2 motivation (Henry, 2009; Lasagabaster, 2011; Taguchi et al., 2009): one was designed for the CLIL group and one for the non-CLIL group.”
- Motivation and Vision: An Analysis of Future L2 Self Images, Sensory Styles, and Imagery Capacity Across Two Target Languages (2013, methodology): “With regard to specific issues, research has shown that the strength of the ideal L2 self increased significantly in teenage girls but decreased in boys over a period of 4 years in Sweden, resulting in a “gender role intensification” (Henry, 2009).”