Science Motivation Questionnaire: Construct Validation With Nonscience Majors

By S. Glynn, Gita Taasoobshirazi, Peggy Brickman. 2009

403 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ba7cd7762243dbeb3d3e0b66f9e79ca55a8d592

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Student Motivation in Constructivist Learning Environment. (2016, background): “(InM) Motivation is defined by Glynn et al. (2009): The internal state that arouses, directs, and sustains students’ behavior towards achieving certain goals.”
Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Students’ Motivation and Self‐Regulation in Science Learning (2011, background): “…the Motivated Strategies Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ, Pintrich et al., 1991), Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey (PALS, Midgley et al., 1996), Students Motivation towards Science Learning (SMTSL, Tuan et al., 2005), and Science Motivation Questionnaire (SMQ, Glynn et al., 2009) were drawn upon.”
Evaluating Instrument Quality in Science Education: Rasch‐based analyses of a Nature of Science test (2011, methodology): “This reliability value is not the same as but can be interpreted much like Cronbach’s α, in which values >0.7 are supportive of reliability inferences (for a discussion of acceptable α values, see Field, 2009).”
Development of a multi-criteria approach for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects (2011, background): “This analysis yields a set of factors or underlying dimensions which, when interpreted and understood, describe the data in a parsimonious but more meaningful number of concepts than the original individual variables (Glynn et al., 2009).”
Measuring Cognitive Engagement With Self-Report Scales: Reflections From Over 20 Years of Research (2015, methodology): “For example, in the work by Glynn and colleagues (Glynn et al., 2011; Glynn et al., 2009), interviews were used to identify constructs that were to be included in the revision of their Science Motivation Questionnaire and to provide them with convergent validity evidence for the scale.”