The measurement of organizational justice in organizational change programmes: A reliability, validity and context‐sensitivity assessment

By J. M. Paterson, Andrea Green, Jane Cary. 2002

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99e40e26cd72ba113d2c6e3ab701f201a9936eca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Joanna Georgalis
2. L. Barton
3. Ramanie Samaratunge
4. Ying Lu
5. N. Kimberley
6. Véronique Ambrosini

Citations in the corpus

• Change process characteristics and resistance to organisational change: The role of employee perceptions of justice (2015, background): “In an Australian context, few studies (Paterson et al., 2002: 97) have examined the relevance of programme characteristics to the acceptance or otherwise of change.”
• Organizational Citizenship and Organizational Justice in Turkish Primary Schools. (2009, background): “Distributive justice is found in the comparison of the proportion of acquisitions gained according to the balance between inputs and outputs of each group ( Paterson et al. , 2002”
• The moderating effect of organizational change cynicism on middle manager strategy commitment (2013, background): “Procedural fairness is important to employees because it offers some form of control over the process and outcomes of decisions, and because it recognizes individuals' standing in the organization, thereby contributing to their sense of self-worth (Paterson, Green and Cary 2002 ; Tremblay, Cloutier”