Recovery experiences as moderators between psychosocial work characteristics and occupational well-being

By Marjo Siltaloppi, Ulla Kinnunen *, T. Feldt. 2009

232 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9905858bcae7e0e41875a64732f75b05405b2dac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Exercise after work, psychological mediators, and affect: A day-level study (2014, unknown): “There is evidence for positive relations between psychological detachment and various measures of affect and well-being (Aronsson, Svensson, & Gustafsson, 2003 ; Fritz, Yankelevich, Zarubin, & Barger, 2010 ; Siltaloppi, Kinnunen, & Feldt, 2009 ).”
Recovery from job stress: The stressor‐detachment model as an integrative framework (2015, background): “…& Han, 2011; Siltaloppi, Kinnunen, & Feldt, 2009; Sonnentag & Fritz, 2007), it is a distinct construct and can be differentiated in confirmatory factor analyses (Shimazu, Sonnentag, Kubota, & Kawakami, 2012; Siltaloppi et al., 2009; Sonnentag, Binnewies, & Mojza, 2008; Sonnentag & Fritz, 2007).”
How Is Leisure Time Interacting with Nature Related to the Need for Recovery from Work Demands? Testing Multiple Mediators (2010, background): “Recent exceptions to this trend are the studies by Sonnentag and Fritz (2007) and Siltaloppi, Kinnunen, and Feldt (2009).”
Psychological Detachment From Work During Leisure Time (2012, background): “Employees who feel more detached from work during off-hours are more satisfied with their lives and experience less emotional exhaustion and lower levels of other symptoms of psychological strain, such as poor sleep (Moreno-Jiménez, Mayo, et al., 2009; Siltaloppi et al., 2009; Sonnentag, Kuttler, & ”
Smartphone Use, Work–Home Interference, and Burnout: A Diary Study on the Role of Recovery (2014, background): “We included only these two types of recovery experience since they have their roots in Effort-Recovery theory (Siltaloppi et al., 2009).”
Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery experiences as mediators (2011, background): “Although there is some evidence showing recovery experiences to work as moderators in the stressor–outcome relationships (eg, Moreno-Jimenez et al, 2009 ; Siltaloppi, Kinnunen, & Feldt, 2009 ), their mediation role has not received attention thus far, with one exception.”
Intraindividual models of employee well-being: What have we learned and where do we go from here? (2015, background): “, Sonnentag, S., & Mojza, E. J. (2010). Recovery during the weekend and fluctuations in weekly job performance: A week-”
Recovery from work-related effort: A meta-analysis (2018, background): “…and relaxation experiences have a more robust relationship with negative outcomes, whereas mastery and control experiences have a more robust relationship with positive outcomes (Siltaloppi et al., 2009), we posit that different recovery experiences will have unique associations with outcomes.”
“Take a break?!” Off-job recovery, job demands, and job resources as predictors of health, active learning, and creativity (2012, background): “Specifically, research on recovery has shown that recovery experiences during nonwork time interact with job demands (Sonnentag, Binnewies, & Mojza, 2010 ) and job resources (Siltaloppi, Kinnunen, & Feldt, 2009 ) in the prediction of poor health and well-being.”