--Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration : Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work

By Robert E. Kraut, Susan R. Fussell, Susan E. Brennan, Jane Siege. 2001

472 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97f53a4ff1c3d07cf81fa9b0efcc3af333fc6c15

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review (2020, background): “However, it is important to note that, like in the case of the telephone, initiating spontaneous communication could be perceived as intrusive [144].”
Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices (2011, background): “…with others supports relational development in multiple ways: social information about others is readily available through identity cues such as appearance, opportunities for sustained and repeated interaction are available, and commonalities among individuals are surfaced (Kraut et al., 2002).”
Identification in Face-to-Face, Hybrid, and Pure Virtual Teams: Untangling the Contradictions (2005, background): “Kraut et al. (2002) suggested that if some members of distributed teams are collocated, ease of local communication and information acquisition might bias the information tracked by the local subgroup, causing them to overattend to the local information at the expense of more remote information.”
Integrating Distributed Work: Comparing Task Design, Communication and Tacit Coordination Mechanisms (2011, methodology): “Yet the communication constraints posed by geographic distance and differences in time zones make this a non-trivial problem (Armstrong and Cole, 2002; Kraut et al. 2002).”
Photocopiers and Water-coolers: The Affordances of Informal Interaction (2007, background): “The relative paucity of informal interaction in virtual teams has been found to have a negative effect on the performance of those teams (Kraut et al. 2002).”
Does it matter where your manager works? Comparing managerial work mode (traditional, telework, virtual) across subordinate work experiences and outcomes (2011, background): “Whereas in traditional offices subordinates are colocated with their managers and thus able to physically observe supervisors to identify salient information and cues, in situations where managers telework or work virtually subordinates are apt to have greater difficulty comprehending the meaning of”
How Conversations Change Over Time in Face-to-Face and Video-Mediated Communication (2009, background): “In collocated settings, people can use the full range of linguistic, paralinguistic, and nonverbal behaviors to communicate (Kraut et al., 2002), and use deictic gestures (i.”
Argumentation for Learning: Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories (2016, background): “Computer-mediated communication often contains less “social,” off-topic communication; is more structured; and is less ambiguous than communication conducted in person (e.g., Kraut et al., 2002).”
Go (Con)figure: Subgroups, Imbalance, and Isolates in Geographically Dispersed Teams (2009, unknown): “Lacking this contextual information, teams find it more difficult to coordinate their work, accomplish their tasks (Clark and Brennan 1991; Fussell and Krauss 1992), and resolve coordination problems when they arise (Cramton 2002; Kraut et al. 2002).”