The Medium and the Message: The Adaptive Use of Communication Media in Dyadic Influence

By B. Barry, I. Fulmer. 2004

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/96c416e3c05f5944c5251fb270d4ad68f3d2680d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Mike W. Peng
2. Philip L. Roth
3. Jason Bennett Thatcher
4. Kris Byron
5. Gerben A. van Kleef
6. Thomas E. Kida
7. Aaron Saiewitz

In Social Psychology

1. N. Reinsch
2. Mike W. Peng
3. Philip L. Roth
4. Jason Bennett Thatcher
5. Kris Byron
6. Chad H. Van Iddekinge
7. Jeanine Warisse Turner
8. Gerben A. van Kleef

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Yan-leung Cheung
2. Philip Bobko
3. Weiqiang Tan
4. Mike W. Peng
5. Philip L. Roth
6. Jason Bennett Thatcher
7. W. Su
8. Kris Byron

Citations in the corpus

• The Signaling Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility in Emerging Economies (2016, background): “Through its own bandwidth and outlets, media can create dynamic communication with stakeholders in terms of disclosure or surveillance (Barry and Fulmer 2004).”
• Social Media in Employee-Selection-Related Decisions (2016, background): “Based on the communication literature, Potosky (2008) suggested that the lack of two-way communication (and the feedback inherent within it) may result in negative perceptions of a testing practice (see also Barry & Fulmer, 2004).”
• The Business Communicator as Presence Allocator: Multicommunicating, Equivocality, and Status at Work (2007, background): “A body of literature continues to build on and modify the insights of media choice researchers (e.g., Barry & Fulmer, 2004; Carlson & Zmud, 1999; Kraut, Rice, Cool, & Fish, 1998; Vickery, Droge, Stank, Goldsby, & Markland, 2004).”
• Highly automated job interviews: Acceptance under the influence of stakes (2019, unknown): “…the interview is equal (e.g., recording of the interview), people might perceive more surveillance in the case of highly-automated interviews (cf. Barry & Fulmer, 2004) because it might be less certain what happens with one’s data during such interviews (which, again, is also an issue of low…”
• Carrying too Heavy a Load? The Communication and Miscommunication of Emotion by Email (2008, background): “In doing so, I argue that narrow views of communication media are insufficient to explain new media and that considering both objective and perceptual and social processes has the greatest potential to advance understanding on this topic (e.g., Barry & Fulmer, 2004).”