Dimensionality of individualism–collectivism and measurement equivalence of Triandis and Gelfand’s scale

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Drivers of attitudes toward luxury brands: A Cross-National Investigation into the roles of Interpersonal Influence and Brand Consciousness (2014, background): “For example, Li and Aksoy (2007) had found difficulty in establishing discriminant validity with respect to the HOR-VER dimensions, while Shavitt et al. (2006) found that COL was highly correlated with the vertical dimension.”
Measuring personal cultural orientations: scale development and validation (2010, background): “2006); but others question its dimensionality and measurement equivalence (Li and Aksoy 2007).”
Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: The moderating role of CSR‐specific relative autonomy and individualism (2018, methodology): “We used Triandis and Gelfand's (1998) four‐item horizontal individualism scale to assess participants' individualism.8 This scale has demonstrated positive psychometric properties in prior cross‐cultural research (Chirkov, Ryan, Kim, & Kaplan, 2003; Li & Aksoy, 2007; Shao & Skarlicki, 2014).”