Variable-centered and person-centered approaches to childhood personality.
By Ivan Mervielde, Jens B. Asendorpf. 2000
88 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95a58a21c3012eaaffc3183d1493527cb597b0d7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- M. Ashton
- Kibeom Lee
- Filip De Fruyt
- J. Denollet
- Benjamin E. Hilbig
- Ingo Zettler
- R. D. Vries
- P. Jonason
Citations in the corpus
- The relation between personality and prejudice: a variable‐ and a person‐centred approach (2003, unknown): “…& van Aken, 2001; Asendorpf & van Aken, 1999; Barbaranelli, 2002; Boehm, Asendorpf, & Avia, 2002; Caspi, 1998; De Fruyt, Mervielde, & Van Leeuwen, 2002; Mervielde & Asendorpf, 2000; Pulkkinen, 1996; Rammstedt, Riemann, Angleitner, & Borkenau, in press; Schnabel, Asendorpf, & Ostendorf, 2002).”
- The puzzle of personality types (2002, background): “Throughout the history of personality psychology, it has been pointed out that such a variable-centred approach may miss an important aspect of personality, the configuration of traits within an individual (Stern, 1911; Allport, 1937; Block, 1971; Magnusson, 1988; Mervielde & Asendorpf, 2000).”
- The consistency of personality type classification across samples and five‐factor measures (2002, background): “The factor structure proves to be highly replicable across both childhood and adolescence, with Cronbach alphas for domains and facets in adult observer samples usually exceeding 0.80 (Mervielde & Asendorpf, 2000; Mervielde & De Fruyt, 1999).”
- A defence of the lexical approach to the study of personality structure (2005, methodology): “…research, by identifying the most frequently occurring intraindividual organizations of behaviour; to use the card-playing analogy of Mervielde and Asendorpf (2000), variable-centred investigations identify the features of the playing cards (e.g. value, colour, suit), whereas…”
- Validity of Big Five personality judgments in childhood: a 9 year longitudinal study (2003, unknown): “According to a recent review by Mervielde and Asendorpf (2000), the FFM has been supported best by parental and teacher ratings of personality.”
- Type D Personality: A Five-Factor Model Perspective (2002, methodology): “The usefulness of combining the dimensional and the type approach has been recently discussed by Mervielde and Asendorpf (2000).”