The puzzle of personality types

By Jens B. Asendorpf. 2002

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b83f7eb61d130a3bd04871e7799ae965153fcf9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Kibeom Lee
2. M. Ashton
3. Benjamin E. Hilbig
4. Reinout E. de Vries
5. Ingo Zettler
6. Jens B. Asendorpf
7. R. D. Vries
8. Isabel Thielmann

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Kibeom Lee
2. M. Ashton
3. Jens B. Asendorpf
4. Benjamin E. Hilbig
5. Ingo Zettler
6. Jaap J. A. Denissen
7. Reinout E. de Vries
8. B. Visser

Citations in the corpus

• A defence of the lexical approach to the study of personality structure (2005, methodology): “For a detailed treatment of the puzzle of personality types, see the March 2002 special issue of this journal (e.g. Asendorpf, 2002).”
• Head‐to‐head comparison of the predictive validity of personality types and dimensions (2003, background): “Therefore, it has been repeatedly suggested to make better use of the ‘idiographic’ information on personality structure in ‘nomothetic’ predictions of personality correlates (Asendorpf & van Aken, 1999; Asendorpf et al., 2001, 2002; Block, 1971; Caspi, 1998; York & John, 1992).”