Type D Personality: A Five-Factor Model Perspective

By Filip De Fruyt, J. Denollet. 2002

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aaf1ac96238b2ce42344e8103449537417529bf7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. John Maltby
2. Carmel Proctor
3. J. Rolland
4. P. Alex Linley
5. Filip De Fruyt
6. S. Joseph
7. Alex M. Wood
8. Dejun Kong

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. John Maltby
2. P. Alex Linley
3. Carmel Proctor
4. J. Rolland
5. Filip De Fruyt
6. Susan Antaramian
7. E. Scott Huebner

Citations in the corpus

• The validity of FFM personality dimensions and maladaptive traits to predict negative affects at work: a six month prospective study in a military sample (2003, background): “However, there are only a few studies examining the predictive validity of the full FFM and affects (De Fruyt & Denollet, 2002; McCrae & Costa, 1991; Riemann et al., 1998; Yik & Russell, 2001; Watson & Clark, 1992), and there is no research on personality and affect conducted in work settings.”
• Strengths Use as a Predictor of Well-Being and Health-Related Quality of Life (2011, background): “Moreover, these finding are interesting in light of research which has demonstrated that experiencing simultaneous negative emotion and inhibited self-expression in social interaction (Type D personality) is linked to decreased HRQOL (see Fruyt and Denollet 2002).”