Validity of Big Five personality judgments in childhood: a 9 year longitudinal study

By Jens B. Asendorpf, M. V. van Aken. 2003

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/41ad3f8049aeb4f20abbb72b4d5ae411aab81895

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Jaap J. A. Denissen
2. C. V. van Lieshout
3. Jens B. Asendorpf
4. Susan J T Branje
5. J. Gerris
6. M. Back
7. L. Penke
8. L. Bergman

In Social Psychology

1. Jens B. Asendorpf
2. Jaap J. A. Denissen
3. Susan J T Branje
4. J. Gerris
5. C. V. van Lieshout

Citations in the corpus

• Big Five personality development in adolescence and adulthood (2007, background): “They are not incompatible with other models of personality (Van Lieshout, 2000) and can be reliably assessed in adolescence (Asendorpf & Van Aken, 2003; Costa & McCrae, 1994; De Fruyt, Mervielde, Hoekstra, & Rolland, 2000).”
• Head‐to‐head comparison of the predictive validity of personality types and dimensions (2003, methodology): “The teacher Q-sort scale for agreeableness at ages 4–6 was reliable, � ¼ 0.88, and correlated � 0.35, p Asendorpf & van Aken, 2003 ).”
• Predictive Validity of Personality Types Versus Personality Dimensions From Early Childhood to Adulthood: Implications for the Distinction Between Core and Surface Traits (2006, background): “The Big Five scales have also been shown to have substantial validity in the prediction of longitudinal outcomes (e.g., Abe, 2005; Asendorpf & van Aken, 2003b; Markey, Markey, & Tinsley, 2003).,The reliabilities of the five indices were satisfactory (median α = .78, range .72‐.89), and the indices”