A defence of the lexical approach to the study of personality structure

By M. Ashton, Kibeom Lee. 2005

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6142ed8196f19e131d05b3c77234a1fa3bfe69b1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Development of Indirect Measures of Conscientiousness: Combining a Facets Approach and Network Analysis (2015, methodology): “Therefore, rather than selecting stimuli on the basis of expert judgment, as usually carried out in IAT studies, we carefully selected the markers to be used as stimuli by means of a dedicated psycholexical study (Ashton & Lee, 2005; De Raad et al., 2014; Goldberg, 1990; Saucier et al., 2014).”
A Psychometric Network Perspective on the Validity and Validation of Personality Trait Questionnaires (2019, background): “Many personality researchers hold this view of reflective latent variables (e.g. Ashton and Lee, 2005; Goldberg, 1993).”
Correlation and Causation in the Study of Personality (2012, background): “Mulaik (2005) reviewed certain aspects of the controversies; noteworthy recent contributions include Borsboom, Mellenbergh, and van Heerden (2003), Molenaar (2004), Bartholomew (2004), Ashton and Lee (2005), and Bartholomew, Deary, and Lawn (2009).”
Rational Misbehavior? Evaluating an Integrated Dual-Process Model of Criminal Decision Making (2014, background): “immorality, pretentiousness, unethical decision making, employee integrity (Ashton and Lee 2005; De Vries et al. 2009b; De Vries and Van Kampen 2010; Lee and Ashton 2004), and also to criminal choice (Van Gelder and De Vries 2012).”
The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality Factors (2014, background): “…the domain of subjectively important personality characteristics for the speakers of a given language, and thereby removes much of the potential for researcher bias in variable selection (for discussion about the precise boundaries of the personality domain, see Ashton & Lee, 2005; Saucier, 2009).”