Origins of bullying : Theoretical frameworks for explaining workplace bullying
By H. Hoel, Cary L. Cooper. 2001
118 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/94611ca3d9416ebd3baec3c82c1cf2b75b0cfd38
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Pamela Lutgen-Sandvik
- Staale Einarsen
- Denise Salin
- H. Hoel
- Michelle R. Tuckey
- Sarah J. Tracy
- Upasna A. Agarwal
- Arpana Rai
Citations in the corpus
- The role of the psychosocial safety climate in coping with workplace bullying: A grounded theory and sequential tree analysis (2016, background): “Keywords: Workplace bullying; escalation; psychosocial safety climate; coping strategies Workplace bullying is a serious stressor that can affect individuals, employees, and organizations (Hoel & Cooper, 2001).”
- Nightmares, Demons, and Slaves (2006, result): “The ethnic diversity was similarly homogeneous to past studies of workplace bullying (Einarsen & Raknes, 1997; Hoel & Cooper, 2001; Rayner & Cooper, 1997; Zapf, Knorz, & Kulla, 1996), with 24 participants being White, 2 Hispanic, and 1 who described herself as White and African American.”
- Take This Job and … : Quitting and Other Forms of Resistance to Workplace Bullying (2006, background): “Although bullying is usually targeted at more than one person in a workgroup (Hoel & Cooper, 2001; Lutgen-Sandvik, 2003a; Rayner, 1997; Rayner et al., 2002), this choice resulted in a specific sample type.”
- Managers in the firing line: Contributing factors to workplace bullying by staff – an interview study (2007, background): “According to Hoel and Cooper (2001), “the long-term nature of the phenomenon is one of the most salient features of the problem” (p. 4).”
- Ways of Explaining Workplace Bullying: A Review of Enabling, Motivating and Precipitating Structures and Processes in the Work Environment (2003, background): “In contrast to the literature on workplace aggression (Neuman & Baron, 1998) and social undermining (Duffy et al., 2002), intent is typically not part of the definition, but instead the subjective perception of the victim is stressed (cf. Hoel & Cooper, 2001).”
- Abusive Supervision in Work Organizations: Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda (2007, background): “(Hoel & Cooper, 2001: 4) Like abusive supervision, bullying involves repeated exposure to hostile actions at work (Hoel, Rayner, & Cooper, 1999).”
- Workplace Bullying, Mobbing and General Harassment: A Review (2013, unknown): “…(Matthiesen and Einarsen 2007, p. 735) In relation to the definition provided, ‘period of time’ firstly reflects the characteristic of persistency, or a pattern of behaviours (Einarsen et al. 2011), which distinguishes bullying from a ‘one-off clash’ (Saunders et al. 2007; Hoel and Cooper 2001).”
- What Have I Done to Deserve This? Effects of Employee Personality and Emotion on Abusive Supervision (2014, unknown): “themselves (Hoel and Cooper 2001).”
- The experience of bullying in Great Britain: The impact of organizational status (2001, background): “Of course, being under constant pressure to deliver in an increasingly hostile work environment is also likely to manifest itself in a more authoritarian work regime with practices that may be construed as bullying by workers as a natural outcome (Hoel & Cooper, 2001).”
- Workplace bullying and employee silence (2017, background): “…from the perpetrator’s organizational position, informal power, the target’s dependency on the perpetrator, and/or target and perpetrator’s personality traits (Aquino and Thau, 2009; Einarsen et al., 2011; Hoel and Cooper, 2001; Keashly and Jagatic, 2003; Samnani, 2013; Zabrodska et al., 2014).”