A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys.

By Amanda J. Rose, K. Rudolph. Psychological bulletin, 2006

2,582 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93a8f51835c28d53a812305ffe3480a1dc8b6220

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Education

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The role of sources of social support on depression and quality of life for university students (2019, background): “…possible that females are more vulnerable to stressors, and relationships with others but that they are sociable and tend to make better use of social support sources and emotional support strategies to manage such stressors and relationships problems (Camara & Padilla, 2017; Rose & Rudolph, 2006).”
How Effective Are Mentoring Programs for Youth? A Systematic Assessment of the Evidence (2011, background): “…relationship process that entails a preoccupation with discussion of problems, their possible causes and consequences, and negative feelings) as being both more common in the friendships of girls and more detrimental to girls’ well-being relative to that of boys (Rose & Rudolph, 2006).”
Peer victimization trajectories and their association with children’s affect in late elementary school (2010, background): “Although some studies suggest girls experience more relational victimization than boys, these sex differences are not found consistently (Rose & Rudolph, 2006).”
Gender and Adolescent Development. (2011, background): “These different styles may render girls more vulnerable to depression (especially following negative relationship events) but protect them from externalizing behavior (e.g., aggression, recklessness); the reverse may be true for boys (Rose & Rudolph, 2006).”
Passive social network site use and subjective well-being among Chinese university students: A moderated mediation model of envy and gender (2017, background): “…sex-linked adjustment, females' social-cognitive styles involve connection-oriented goals and interpersonal concerns; thus, social stress in the form of envy (Smith & Kim, 2007) may represent a particularly stronger threat to females' emotional well-being compared to males' (Rose & Rudolph, 2006).”
The his and hers of prosocial behavior: an examination of the social psychology of gender. (2009, background): “…patterns in adult behavior are preceded by analogous trends in childhood and adolescent friendships: Girls are more likely than boys to engage in prosocial interactions emphasizing helping, self-disclosure, and empathy (e.g., Rose & Asher, 2004; see review by Rose & Rudolph, 2006, Tables 1 and 2).”
The Digital Self: How Social Media Serves as a Setting that Shapes Youth’s Emotional Experiences (2015, background): “For instance, compared with boys, girls appear to possess a greater number of friendships (e.g., Rose et al. 2011) that are characterized by a high level of affective connection (see Rose and Rudolph 2006 for a review).”
Exploring the Relationships Between Different Types of Facebook Use, Perceived Online Social Support, and Adolescents’ Depressed Mood (2016, background): “…difference may be explained by adolescents’ difference in social skills, as research has shown that girls are more socially skilled than boys (e.g., Rose & Rudolph, 2006) and believed to use more expression in off-line and online social interaction than boys (e.g., Kaare, Brandtzaeg, Heim, &…”
The Relationship Between Latino Adolescents’ Perceptions of Discrimination, Neighborhood Risk, and Parenting on Self-Esteem and Depressive Symptoms (2011, background): “…self-perceptions and increased depression is stronger for adolescent girls than boys (for a meta-analysis, see Kling, Hyde, Shower, & Buswell, 1999), which may be due to girls’ heightened rates of depression (Crick & Zahn-Waxler, 2003; Eberhart, Shih, Hammen, & Brennan, 2006; Rose & Rudolph, 2006).”