GLOBE practices and values: A case of diminishing marginal utility?

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations (2014, background): “Also, some criticize the way in which GLOBE measured cultural values (Brewer & Venaik, 2010; Maseland & van Hoorn, 2010).”
The GLOBE debate: Back to relevance (2010, background): “THE MARGINAL UTILITY DEBATE: MASELAND AND VAN HOORN VS BREWER AND VENAIK; TARAS, STEEL, AND KIRKMAN In my perspective, the debate in JIBS between Maseland and van Hoorn (2009, 2010) and Brewer and Venaik (2010) is largely trivial, because none of”
Situational job characteristics and job satisfaction: The moderating role of national culture (2015, background): “Another issue concerns the use of national cultural scores for individuals (for a general discussion, see e.g. Brewer & Venaik, 2010; Brewer & Venaik, 2011; Steel & Taras, 2010).”
Negative practice–value correlations in the GLOBE data: Unexpected findings, questionnaire limitations and research directions (2010, background): “Recently, Maseland and van Hoorn (2009), in their research note published in this journal and revisited in this issue (Maseland & van Hoorn, 2010), and Brewer and Venaik (2010) offered competing explanations for some of the more intriguing findings in the GLOBE study. The purpose of this commentary ”