Can You Measure the ROI of Your Social Media Marketing
By Donna L. Hoffman, Marek Fodor. 2010
1,039 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93047f2ffb8cd5e1fe6204a11e67c67ca4cfee16
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
- Ali Abdallah Alalwan
- Nripendra P. Rana
- P. K. Kannan
- Brendan James Keegan
- Marie-Odile Richard
- Rebecca A. VanMeter
- Jennifer E. Rowley
Citations in the corpus
- Consumer Power: Evolution in the Digital Age (2013, background): “Consumers' search activity thus can serve as a proxy of objective measures of consumer economic activity (Hoffman and Fodor 2010).”
- From Online Motivations to Ad Clicks and to Behavioral Intentions: An Empirical Study of Consumer Response to Social Media Advertising (2016, background): “In the context of social media, Hoffman and Fodor (2010) identified four consumer motivations that propel online behavior namely connections, creation, consumption, and control (4C’s).”
- Consumer engagement with self-expressive brands: brand love and WOM outcomes (2014, background): “As the literature considers ‘Likes’ as a manifest variable of brand engagement on social networks (Chauhan and Pillai, 2013; Hoffman and Fodor, 2010; Malhotra et al., 2013), respondents were asked to identify a brand they ‘Liked’ on Facebook.”
- Who “Likes” You … and Why? A Typology of Facebook Fans (2014, background): “For marketing managers concerned with measuring the return on investment (ROI) of their social media investment, the number of “likes” on a Fan page provides a social-media metric, and can be considered a proxy measure of WOM (Hoffman and Fodor, 2010) and brand engagement (Hollis, 2011).”
- Determinants of social media adoption by B2B organizations (2015, background): “Extant literature suggests that traditional metrics are unsuitable for this dynamic and highly interactive environment (Borders, Johnston, & Rigdon, 2001; Hoffman & Fodor, 2010), which might explain marketers’ tendency not to assess their effectiveness.”
- An Examination of Social Media Role in Entrepreneurial Intention among Accounting Students: A SEM Study (2019, methodology): “But, it is critical for organizations to initially think of the goals and aims of social media usage and methods to quantify the findings (Hoffman & Fodor, 2010; Murdough, 2009).”
- User generated content presenting brands on social media increases young adults’ purchase intention (2019, background): “In the MIT Sloan Management Review, businesses even get advised to redefine their social media marketing goals in a way that includes brand engagement, i.e. customers posting branded content, as an ROI indicator (Hoffman and Fodor 2010).”
- Giving too much social support: social overload on social networking sites (2015, background): “Several studies report successful hiring strategies using SNS (Weitzel et al, 2009; Leidner et al, 2010) and identify a large potential audience that can be used for branding purposes (Culnan et al, 2010; Gallaugher & Ransbotham, 2010; Hoffman & Fodor, 2010).”
- Social media in marketing: A review and analysis of the existing literature (2017, background): “In their case study to test the impact of both Facebook and Twitter on the consumers’ engagement and decision-making towards music festival events, Hudson and Hudson (2013) were able to confirm the positive impact of these social media platforms on the customers’ engagement after purchase.”
- A Review of Social Media and Implications for the Sales Process (2012, background): “Remembering that social media is about engagement and collaboration, however, most practitioners agree that traditional metrics will need to be redefined (Hoffman and Fodor 2010).”
- The History of Social Media and its Impact on Business (2011, background): “It is difficult to determine precise numbers for the ROI from social media yet the social networking‟s ROI is a bit obvious (Hartshorn, 2010; Hoffman & Fodor, 2010; Wilfong, 2010).”
- Of “Likes” and “Pins”: The Effects of Consumers’ Attachment to Social Media (2015, background): “…Naylor, Lamberton, and West 2012); seller, retailer, and consumer interactions (Blazevic et al. 2014; Rapp et al. 2013); the appropriateness of viral marketing via social media for various product types (Schulze, Schöler, and Skiera 2014); as well as company ROI (e.g., Hoffman and Fodor 2010).”
- The Role of Social Media Content Format and Platform in Users’ Engagement Behavior (2021, background): “On the other hand, the user-centric variables (dependent variables) show users' reactions to firms' content in the form of engagement on social media fan pages (Hoffman & Fodor, 2010).”