Strategic alliance-based sourcing and market performance: evidence from foreign firms operating in China

By Janet Murray, Masaaki Kotabe, J. Zhou. 2005

246 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/914a99526cdd3677b179519728736204f2eb03d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Learning and Innovation in International Strategic Alliances: An Empirical Test of the Role of Trust and Tacitness (2009, background): “Hence, similar to Murray et al. (2005), in our study, innovation is defined as a composite of product and process innovation.”
Strategic planning and performance: extending the debate (2008, background): “The literature suggests a high degree of correlation between perceptual and objective measures of organizational performance (Venkatraman and Ramanujam, 1986; Dess and Robinson, 1984; Murray et al., 2005), and hence confidence in their use was high.”
Corporate Social Responsibility, Product Differentiation Strategy and Export Performance (2010, result): “Although both indicators have been newly developed for this research in order to be in line with the respondents’ characteristics and language, they have been inspired by previous studies (such as Knight and Cavusgil 2004; Murray et al., 2005).”
Business and management in China: A review of empirical research in leading international journals (2007, background): “Negotiation between partners Ghauri and Fang (2001), Luo and Shenkar (2002), Shi, X. (2001) Supply strategic alliances in China Brookfield and Liu (2005), Murray et al. (2005) , Trimarchi and Tamaschke (2004) Distribution strategic alliances in China Li (2001, 2003), Li and Ng (2002) Identification”
Resource Dependence Theory: A Review (2009, methodology): “Others integrate RDT with game theory and organizational learning to understand partner power (Saxton, 1997), with agency theory to model JV control structures (Kumar & Seth, 1998), with transaction cost and/or network theory to predict partner choice (Elg, 2000; Steensma, Marino, Weaver, & Dickson,”