Child Well-being: A Systematic Review of the Literature
By Elizabeth L. Pollard, P. D. Lee. 2003
744 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/901cfe9ea3467f8656944e5178efae27a1d921e5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- M. Holder
- B. Coleman
- Karin Linnanmäki
- J. Minkkinen
- Billy O'Steen
- K. Moore
- Pirjo Aunio *
- Lalage Sanders
In Education
- M. Holder
- B. Coleman
- K. Moore
- Hugh McIntosh
- Sietske van Viersen
- Karin Linnanmäki
- J. Reijnders
- J. Minkkinen
In Social Psychology
- M. Holder
- B. Coleman
- K. Moore
- L. Lippman
- Hugh McIntosh
- Sietske van Viersen
- Karin Linnanmäki
- J. Reijnders
Citations in the corpus
- Positive Indicators of Child Well-Being: A Conceptual Framework, Measures, and Methodological Issues (2011, background): “In their review of the literature on child well-being, the authors identified a commonly used framework involving 5 domains.(Pollard and Lee, 2003) Individual 1.”
- Wellbeing in schools: what do students tell us? (2018, background): “A systematic literature review by Pollard and Lee (2003) identified five distinct domains of wellbeing: physical, psychological, cognitive, social and economic.”
- The Structural Model of Child Well-Being (2013, background): “Further, physical, mental and social dimensions can be found in almost every list of the domains of child well-being although mental well-being is often decentralized into several domains such as psychological and cognitive (Pollard and Lee 2003).”
- A Microdata Child Well-Being Index: Conceptualization, Creation, and Findings (2008, background): “Despite the availability of more data in the USA, it has been difficult to achieve public consensus about what the key indicators of child well-being are, since personal values, cultural differences, and definitions about children’s well-being vary (Moore 1997; Pollard and Lee 2003 ).”
- The Psychological Well-Being of Early Identified Gifted Children (2016, methodology): “In a systematic review of the literature on the well-being of children, Pollard and Lee (2003) concluded that the definitions of well-being in children vary so greatly that comparison seems impossible.”
- The student well-being model: a conceptual framework for the development of student well-being indicators (2014, background): “…multiple interpretations of how it should be defined and used, as well as the importance of exploring how well-being is understood and experienced across diverse populations and contexts (Ereaut & Whiting, 2008; Fraillon, 2004; Knight & McNaught, 2011; Pollard & Lee, 2003; Rose & Rowlands, 2010).”
- Students’ Well-Being and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study (2021, background): “The contradictory literature partly stems from measuring well-being based on only a single domain (Pollard & Lee, 2003).”
- The Contribution of Social Relationships to Children’s Happiness (2009, background): “There is no generally accepted measure of well-being or happiness for children and most studies rely on subjective measures (Pollard and Lee 2003).”
- Nature as children's space: A systematic review (2017, background): “The focus of the empirical studies spanned various aspects of children’s direct experiences in natural spaces, and underscored three components of children’s well-being, namely physical, emotional, and psychological (Pollard & Lee, 2003).”
- Learning difficulties, academic well-being and educational dropout: A person-centred approach (2014, methodology): “Positive and negative indicators of well-being—such as self-esteem, school value and stress—are commonly used indicators of adolescent academic well-being (Pollard & Lee, 2003).”
- Socially Assistive Robots in Elderly Care: A Mixed-Method Systematic Literature Review (2014, background): “Because of the multifaceted nature of well-being (Diener, 2009; Michaelson et al., 2009; Pollard & Lee, 2003; Stiglitz, Sen, & Fitoussi, 2009), in order to acquire deeper and more organized knowledge about the effects of SAR on well-being of the elderly, it is better to categorize them.”
- The challenge of defining wellbeing (2012, background): “Consequently, the diversity of dimensions has created a ‚confusing and contradictory research base‛ (Pollard and Lee, 2003, p. 2).”
- Indicators and Indices of Child Well-being: A Brief American History (2007, background): “On the issue of cut-points, Pollard and Lee (2003) noted in”