Corporate social responsibility disclosure and its relation on institutional ownership: Evidence from public listed companies in Malaysia

By M. Saleh, Norhayah Zulkifli, R. Muhamad. 2010

257 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86fe8f87ae2ee7142923e3586b8360684d200a00

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Developing Countries: A Literature Review (2017, background): “…countries (Rizk et al., 2008), as some studies have shown that government ownership (Amran & Devi, 2007, 2008; Haji, 2013), institutional ownership (Saleh et al., 2010) and foreign ownership (Teoh & Thong, 1984; Khan et al., 2013) each has a positive relationship with CSR disclosure, while…”
From Voluntarism to Regulation: A Study on Ownership, Economic Performance and Corporate Environmental Information Disclosure in China (2013, background): “Some prior research found that environmental disclosure is associated with the ownership type (Celik et al. 2006; Healy et al. 1999; Laidroo 2009; Saleh et al. 2010; Xiao et al. 2004).”
Corporate social responsibility disclosures over time: evidence from Malaysia (2013, methodology): “However, few studies specifically regressed the ownership structure patterns against CSR disclosures (Mohd Ghazali, 2007; Amran and Devi, 2008; Saleh et al., 2010; Abdullah et al., 2011).”
Comprehensive Board Diversity and Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from an Emerging Market (2017, methodology): “We rely on the disclosure index that has been used by prior studies including Saleh et al. (2010) and Mohamad et al. (2014).”
Board Diversity and Corporate Social Disclosure: Evidence from Vietnam (2016, background): “…extends the literature by constructing a CSD index that combines disclosure quantity and two aspects of disclosure quality perceived by four socially relevant stakeholder groups, rather than managers or miscellaneous stakeholder perspectives (Haji 2013; McNally et al. 1982; Saleh et al. 2010).”
Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from India (2014, background): “…to in ﬂ uence public perceptions, to legitimise their actions (Abu & Ameer, 2011; Saleh et al., 2010), to protect and enhance their reputation and image (Neu, Warsame, & Pedwell, 1998; Hooghiemstra, 2000; Saleh et al., 2010; Abu & Ameer, 2011) and for increased visibility (Burke & Logsdon, 1996).”