The effect of meal situation, social interaction, physical environment and choice on food acceptability

By S. King, Annette J Weber, H. Meiselman, N. Lv. 2004

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Consumer acceptance and appropriateness of meat substitutes in a meal context (2011, background): “More recent studies showed that individual food items (e.g. lasagna, salad and iced tea) were less accepted than when the same items were served together, as part of a meal (King, Weber, Meiselman, & Lv, 2004; King, Meiselman, Hottenstein, Work, and Cronk, 2007).”
Destination Aesthetics and Aesthetic Distance in Tourism Experience (2015, methodology): “To operationalize destination aesthetic qualities, we adopted the dimensionality conceptualization of Kirillova et al. (2014) with a collection of 21 items comprising nine dimensions of tourist aesthetic judgment.”
Are meat substitutes liked better over time? A repeated in-home use test with meat substitutes or meat in meals (2013, background): “However, what is exactly meant with boredom, how to conceptualize and measure this in repeated exposure studies, is not so straightforward and more complex (Köster, 2003; Moskowitz, 2000; Zandstra et al., 2004). There is currently no universally accepted definition of boredom (Vodanovich, 2003). In ”
APPETITE CONTROL: METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE EVALUATION OF FOODS (2010, background): “There are a few examples in which this has been done (67).”