Procedural Justice in Personnel Selection: International and Cross‐Cultural Perspectives

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Applicant Reactions in Selection: Comprehensive Meta-Analysis into Reaction Generalization Versus Situational Specificity (2010, unknown): “…to the mass of research over many decades that can be argued to have concentrated exclusively upon selection processes and decision making from the recruiter/organizational perspective (Anderson et al., 2001; Ployhart, Ryan, & Bennett, 1999; Schmitt & Chan, 1999; Steiner & Gilliland, 2001).”
Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Methods: An International Comparison between the Netherlands, the United States, France, Spain, Portugal, and Singapore (2008, unknown): “Yet, earlier reviews had postulated that there may be far greater differences in applicant reactions across countries, even given that some rather general similarities may exist (e.g., Steiner & Gilliland, 2001 ).”
Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Techniques in Greece: The Role of Core Self-Evaluations (2007, background): “Nevertheless, the results regarding the favourability of various selection methods and tools are relatively similar, especially in West European and US samples where most of these studies have been carried out (Steiner & Gilliland, 2001).”