New Literacies: Everyday Practices and Classroom Learning
By Colin Lankshear, Michelle Knobel. 2006
778 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c6e0e6425a8121fda7f04bc82c5a38af43ece0e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Christine Greenhow
- Beth Robelia
- Robert O'Dowd
- Richard G. Kern
- Dorothy M. Chun
- S. Drew
- Joke Voogt
- Punya Mishra
Citations in the corpus
- Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century (2013, background): “In addition, it is important to stress that technology literacy and fluency are embedded, that is, the use of technology should be seen within specific real-life contexts (Lankshear & Knobel, 2006).”
- Old Communication, New Literacies: Social Network Sites as Social Learning Resources (2009, background): “…discrepancy between adult perspectives on new media and youth’s experiences can be explained, in part, by a ‘‘generational divide’’ (Herring, 2007, p. 1; Lankshear & Knobel, 2006; Warschauer, 2007) between 1130Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14 (2009) 1130–1161 © 2009 International…”
- Online foreign language interaction: Moving from the periphery to the core of foreign language education? (2009, background): “…(in press) as Telecollaboration 2.0, this model focuses not only on the development of learners’ linguistic and intercultural competence but also on developing the electronic literacies necessary to learn and work in today’s information society (see Guth & Helm in press; Lankshear & Knobel 2006).”
- Young people, new technologies and learning at home: taking context seriously (2012, background): “In describing these informal learning practices we build on, but perhaps go beyond, work on ‘new literacies’ discussed by Jenkins (2006), Lankshear & Knobel (2006) 53”
- Writing in the Wild: Writers’ Motivation in Fan‐Based Affinity Spaces (2013, background): “Lankshear and Knobel (2006) defined literacies as “socially recognized ways of generating, communicating, and negotiating meaningful content through the medium of encoded texts within contexts of participating in Discourses” (p. 64).”
- Sampling "the new" in New Literacies (2007, background): “Hence, our claim that literacies are “socially recognized ways of generating, communicating and negotiating meaningful content through the medium of encoded texts within contexts of participating in Discourses (or, as members of Discourses)” (Lankshear and Knobel 2006, 64).”
- Technology in Language Use, Language Teaching, and Language Learning. (2016, background): “…rapidly changing and transforming as new information and communication technologies emerge, learners (and teachers) need to understand that new types of discourses, social practices, and skills are required to make use of these technologies (Baker, 2010; Lankshear & Knobel, 2006; Leu et al., 2014).”
- Learning, Teaching, and Scholarship in a Digital Age (2009, background): “Web 2.0 facilitates “participatory,” “collaborative,” and “distributed” practices within Web 2.0–enabled formal and nonformal spheres of everyday activities (Lankshear & Knobel, 2006, p. 38).”
- Learning for STEM Literacy: STEM Literacy for Learning (2012, unknown): “Literacy now is interwoven with traditional language processing, mutimodal digital technologies, and social practices of communications (Lankshear & Knobel, 2006).”
- New Literacy Studies (2014, background): “As “literacy studies” continued to encompass a range of research orientations and activities, “New Literacy Studies” emerged to distinguish the sociocultural reframing of literacy from older conceptualizations (Gee, 2008; Lankshear & Knoebel, 2006; Street, 2003).”
- Open Up the Ceiling on the Common Core State Standards: Preparing Students for 21st‐Century Literacy—Now (2012, background): “…more traditional generation to include the new digital genres among academic genres, because they see the use of new media outlets as inferior, deficient, and even detracting from students’ ability to use academic language (Greenhow & Robelia, 2009; Lankshear & Knobel, 2006; Warschauer, 2011).”