Unique and Interactive Effects of Empathy and Social Status on Involvement in Bullying

557 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Predictors of student defenders of peer aggression victims: Empathy and social cognitive factors (2011, methodology): “The findings thus far indicate that affective empathy, rather than cognitive empathy, which refers to knowing how others are feeling, may be more characteristic of defending than bullying behavior (Caravita et al., 2009).”
What Does It Take to Stand Up for the Victim of Bullying?: The Interplay Between Personal and Social Factors (2010, methodology): “…& Hopmeyer, 1998; Sandstrom & Cillessen, 2006; Warden & Mackinnon, 2003; Wentzel, Filisetti, & Looney, 2007) and specifically with defending in midchildhood (Caravita et al., 2009; Goossens, Olthof, & Dekker, 2006), preadolescent (Salmivalli et al., 1996), and adolescent (Caravita et al.) samples.”
Differential effects of the KiVa anti-bullying program on popular and unpopular bullies (2014, background): “…not only do cross-sectional studies document positive correlations betweenbullying andpopularity among children and youth (Berger & Rodkin, 2012; Caravita et al., 2009; de Bruyn, Cillessen, & Wissink, 2010), but also longitudinal studies further demonstrate that aggression and bullying allow…”
Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies’ perceptions of the harm they cause to others and to their own mental health (2013, background): “As Caravita et al. (2009) have noted it is a complex construct comprising cognitive and affective aspects.”