Differential effects of the KiVa anti-bullying program on popular and unpopular bullies

By C. Garandeau, Ihno A. Lee, Christina Salmivalli. 2014

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Plant Science, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f491f7e7d0adb87019532c8c96308f71d7c6137e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Silja Saarento
2. Per Carlbring
3. Christina Salmivalli
4. Mairéad Foody
5. Muthanna Samara
6. K. Rigby

In Plant Science

1. Silja Saarento
2. Per Carlbring
3. Mairéad Foody
4. Muthanna Samara
5. Christina Salmivalli
6. Dorothy Espelage
7. Robert Thornberg
8. K. Rigby

In Social Psychology

1. Silja Saarento
2. Muthanna Samara
3. Per Carlbring
4. Mairéad Foody
5. Christina Salmivalli
6. Robert Thornberg
7. Dorothy Espelage
8. E. Poskiparta

Citations in the corpus

• The Role of Classroom Peer Ecology and Bystanders’ Responses in Bullying (2015, background): “For instance, a frequent problem for programs that prevent and reduce bullying and victimization by targeting peer ecology is that the most popular bullies often resist changing their behavior (41).”
• A review of cyberbullying and suggestions for online psychological therapy (2015, background): “The programme is built on previous research that considers bystanders to be an important element in exasperating bullying behaviour and influencing the impact on victims (Salmivalli, 2010) As such, one main objective of the intervention is to target bystanders and to increase their responsibility fo”