Good and Original: Plagiarism and Patchwriting in Academic Second-Language Writing.

By D. Pecorari. 2003

485 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/888b1aec1c40dcfff063e380c63663f9a3fba43f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

1. Bojana Petrić
2. D. Pecorari
3. Daisy Yan
4. Guangwei Hu
5. Jun Lei
6. Paul Thompson
7. Ken Hyland
8. J. Flowerdew

Citations in the corpus

• The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (2016, background): “Instead, he argues that it also reveals the marketisation and neo-liberalisation of higher education, which is most definitely not a neutral activity (Pennycook, 1997, pp. 258–259).”
• Weeds in the flower garden: An exploration of plagiarism in graduate students' research proposals and its connection to enculturation, ESL, and contextual factors (2010, background): “Perhaps due to these perceived difficulties, conventional wisdom has suggested that ESL students may be more susceptible to plagiarism (Pecorari, 2003).”
• Beyond the accusation of plagiarism (2008, background): “As Pecorari (2003) posits, patchwriting is " a form of textual plagiarism which is caused not by the intention to deceive but by the need for further growth as a writer " (2003: 338).”
• Chinese University Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism (2015, background): “It has been widely discussed that student writers’ beliefs, knowledge, and attitudes regarding plagiarism are subject to enculturational influences (see Abasi et al., 2006; Angélil-Carter, 2000; Pecorari, 2003, 2008).”
• Score generalizability of academic writing tasks: Does one test method fit it all? (2009, background): “This problem has been discussed extensively in the literature (Matalene, 1985; Connor & Kramer, 1995; Pennycook, 1996; Spack, 1993; Pecorari, 2003).”
• Student beliefs and attitudes about authorial identity in academic writing (2009, background): “The findings relating to the experiences of students writing in English as a second language are consistent with previous studies that have demonstrated that, for reasons of both linguistic competency and culture, those students are especially prone to what has been called ‘patchwriting’, which make”
• Technology in Language Use, Language Teaching, and Language Learning. (2016, background): “No doubt this ethos contributes to current debates about plagiarism and its cultural relativity even in nondigital environments (Chandrasoma, Thompson, & Pennycook, 2004; Ivanič, 1998; Pecorari, 2003).”
• Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation (2023, background): “The plagiarizing behaviors have been sternly criticized for being a “heinous crime” (Pecorari, 2003) and “intellectual theft” (Traniello & Bakker, 2016).”
• Plagiarism in second-language writing (2014, methodology): “…A P E T R I Ć • confusion as to what is required (Evans & Youmans, 2000; Gu & Brooks 2008) or a belief that inappropriate strategies were in fact legitimate (Pecorari 2003; Lankamp 2008; Li 2013), or declarative knowledge about what university rules say about plagiarism combined with insufficient…”