Online Technologies Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulated Learning as Predictors of Final Grade and Satisfaction in College-Level Online Courses

By Maria Puzziferro. 2008

466 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8864217a348c6f2a1c7c863230d4e86398234b8b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Gender Studies

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning (2013, background): “In addition, motivations and the use of self-regulated strategies have been positively associated with students ’ performance in and satisfaction with online courses (Artino, 2009; Artino & McCoach, 2008; Paechter et al., 2010; Puzziferro, 2008; Yukselturk & Bulut, 2007).”
The Online Learning Self-Efficacy Scale: Its Adaptation into Turkish and Interpretation According to Various Variables (2020, methodology): “Moreover, besides the scales mentioned here, it is seen that there are also studies (Ergul, 2004; Puzziferro, 2008; Randall, 2001; Zhang, Li, Duan & Wu, 2001) aimed at determining students’ self-efficacy perceptions in online learning environments, that include limited scale items related to…”
Self-Efficacy In Online Learning Environments: A Literature Review (2016, unknown): “Few studies are available that investigated multidimension of self-efficacy in online learning (Bates & Khasawneh, 2007; DeTure, 2004; Fletcher, 2005; Miltiadou & Yu, 2000; Puzziferro, 2008; Shen, Cho, Tsai, & Marra, 2013; W Taipjutorus, 2014; W Taipjutorus, Hansen, & Brown, 2012).”
Comparing online and blended learner's self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance (2017, background): “…learning as Learning Management System (LMS) discussion board activity (e.g., ChanLin, 2012; Johnson, Gueutal, & Falbe, 2009; Michinov, Brunot, Le Bohec, Juhel, & Delaval, 2011) had a stronger positive relationship to academic success than more than subjective measures (e.g., Puzziferro, 2008).”
Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review (2015, background): “Students may use a variety of cognitive, metacognitive, and resource management SRL strategies as part of their SRL behaviour (Puzziferro, 2008).”
Self-regulation in online learning (2013, background): “Effort regulation refers to students’ level of commitment to manage tasks and challenges with regard to their learning (Puzziferro, 2008). Through path analysis, Sungar (2007) reported that student effort regulation is explained mostly in terms of two variables: metacognitive regulation and self-eff”
Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses (2014, background): “Only two studies examined the relationship between self-regulated learning and satisfaction, both of which showed a significantly positive correlation (Artino, 2007; Puzziferro, 2008).”
Online Learning Self-Efficacy in Students With and Without Online Learning Experience (2016, methodology): “Puzziferro (2008) also used the OTSES in relation to online college students’ final grades and satisfaction levels.”
Students’ Self-Confidence and Its Impacts on Their Learning Process (2020, background): “However, Puzziferro (2008) explored online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college found that online technologies selfconfidence is not related to students’ performance.”