Online Peer Review: An Alternative to Face-to-Face?

By Elaine DiGiovanni, Girija Nagaswami. 2001

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers (2005, background): “Recent studies (e.g., DiGiovanni and Nagaswami, 2001; Liu and Sadler, 2003; Tuzi, 2004) have documented several advantages of CMC-based peer response over the traditional response modes, in terms of multi-way communication, dynamism and open-endedness of interaction, logistic flexibility and…”
Feedback on second language students' writing (2006, background): “…computers assists the efficient exchange of student drafts (Palmquist 1993) and more easily facilitates the monitoring of peer feedback, as teachers can more easily switch between different screens than they can get around to a large number of small faceto-face groups (DiGiovanni & Nagaswami 2001).”
Online self-assessment and peer-assessment as a tool to enhance student-teachers’ assessment skills (2018, background): “Peer evaluation can help students learn about the assessment process and develop assessment and learner skills (DiGiovanni and Nagaswami 2001; Chinn 2005).”
Is training student reviewers worth its while? A study of how training influences the quality of students’ feedback and writing (2013, background): “…in second language (L2) writing leads to a significant amount of learning at all educational levels (Allison & Ng, 1992; De Guerrero & Villamil, 1994; DiGiovanni & Nagaswami, 2001; Mendonca & Johnson, 1994; Min, 2006; Peterson, 2003; Tsui & Ng, 2000; Villamil & De Guerrero, 1996, to name a few).”