Is training student reviewers worth its while? A study of how training influences the quality of students’ feedback and writing

By M. Rahimi. 2013

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a30eaeca23f71482bc5904c78f99a1fa6c196c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Shulin Yu
2. Icy Lee
3. N. Storch

In Education

1. Shulin Yu
2. Icy Lee
3. N. Storch
4. A. Hamouda
5. Yao Zheng
6. Ricky Lam
7. Ye Han

In Language and Linguistics

1. Shulin Yu
2. Icy Lee
3. A. Hamouda
4. Yao Zheng
5. Ricky Lam

Citations in the corpus

• Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014) (2016, methodology): “A recent study on peer feedback training by Rahimi (2013) investigated the effects of peer feedback training on the quality of feedback, revisions, and writing in the long run.”
• Understanding EFL students’ participation in group peer feedback of L2 writing: A case study from an activity theory perspective (2015, background): “Recent research has primarily centered on how to make full use of this activity to contribute to students’ writing development by exploring different aspects of peer feedback, such as peer feedback training, peer interaction, cultural issues in peer feedback, computer-mediated peer feedback, and cog”