Psychometric properties of a self-efficacy scale for English language learners in China

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The association between teacher-student relationship and academic achievement in Chinese EFL context: a serial multiple mediation model (2018, methodology): “The reliability of the scale was .97 for all items, convergent validity was .52, and the criterion-related validity was .58 (Wang et al., 2014).”
English language learners' self-efficacy profiles and relationship with self-regulated learning strategies (2015, methodology): “Data from Chinese and Korean college students were analyzed using item response theory to examine the psychometric properties of QESE (Wang, Kim, Bong, & Ahn, 2013; Wang et al., 2014).”
Examining the relationship between English language learners’ online self-regulation and their self-efficacy (2017, unknown): “Questionnaire assessing students’ English language self-efficacy The other instrument, the English language self-efficacy (ELSE) questionnaire, was adapted from Wang et al. (2014) to assess students’ English self-efficacy in four skills: listening, speaking, reading, and writing.”
Entrepreneurship Education and Students’ Entrepreneurial Intention in Higher Education (2020, background): “Researchers suggest that low self-efficacy of entrepreneurial decision-making will hinder their career exploration and the development of career decision-making skills [9,46].”