Achieving Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Family Capital Theory
By James J. Hoffman, Mark L. Hoelscher, R. Sorenson. 2006
385 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85e023382bccf5f578669877c04058ad281b5245
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Ines Herrero
- Mattias Nordqvist
- L. Stanley
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- Josep Llach
- M. Cucculelli
- Christian Koropp
- Birgit Feldbauer-Durstmüller
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Ines Herrero
- L. Stanley
- Mattias Nordqvist
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- S. Danes
- K. Stafford
- G. Haynes
- Josep Llach
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Ines Herrero
- Mattias Nordqvist
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- L. Stanley
- S. Danes
- K. Stafford
- G. Haynes
- Josep Llach
Citations in the corpus
- Innovation in family and non-family businesses: a resource perspective (2010, background): “Social capital is a term that comes from the sociology literature (Putnam, 1993) and is defined as the resources that exist in relationships among people (Hoffman et al., 2006).”
- Owner‐Management, Firm Age, and Productivity in Italian Family Firms (2014, background): “…counterparts Other theories have been employed to explain the positive performance of family businesses, including stewardship theory (Donaldson and Davis, 1991; Miller et al., 2008) and the concepts of “familiness” (Habbershon and Williams, 1999) and family capital (Hoffman et al., 2006).”
- Image and reputation of family firms: a systematic literature review of the state of research (2018, background): “Long-term orientation (Huybrechts et al. 2011; Iyer 1999; Le Breton-Miller and Miller 2006, 2015), social ties (Hoffman et al. 2006; Huybrechts et al. 2011; Iyer 1999) and ethical values (Hoffman et al. 2006; Iyer 1999) are identified as additional drivers of image and reputation building.”
- Social Entrepreneurial Intention Formation of Corporate Volunteers (2013, background): “More specific, social norms represent internalized agreements on accepted and expected behaviors in a social system and serve as social-control mechanisms for decision-making processes within corporations (Grichnik, Koropp, and Kellermanns 2011; Hoffman, Hoelscher, and Sorenson 2006).”
- How Familial Is Family Social Capital? Analyzing Bonding Social Capital in Family and Nonfamily Firms (2018, background): “According to the literature on social capital, tacit knowledge is more easily available and shared where there are family ties relative to nonfamily ties (Sirmon & Hitt, 2003), because of the shared vision, common language, and strong, enduring relationships that family members often have (Hoffman e”
- Family Capital of Family Firms (2009, background): “Hoffman et al. (2006) noted that only two of three components of social capital pertain to family capital, namely, structural and relational components.”
- Financial Decision Making in Family Firms (2014, background): “Family norms serve as social control mechanisms for decision-making processes in family firms (Hoffman et al., 2006), especially when decisions involve the management of resources (Aldrich & Cliff, 2003; Sirmon & Hitt, 2003).”