The role of perceived negativity in the moderation of African Americans' implicit and explicit racial attitudes

By R. Livingston. 2002

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8345a96e4355214f3f0c237435edd6e022382e03

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Attitudes Toward Traditional and Nontraditional Parents1 (2005, background): “Perceived cultural norms have been shown to predict behavior above and beyond personal attitudes (Ajzen, 1996), moderate the expression of personally endorsed attitudes (Sechrist & Stangor, 2001), and strongly influence automatic judgments and behaviors (Correll, Park, Judd, & Wittenbrink, 2002; Dev”
Teachers Are People Too: Examining the Racial Bias of Teachers Compared to Other American Adults (2020, background): “Previous research shows that Black Americans can hold in-group implicit bias, albeit not as frequently as Whites, and those biases can shape judgements, just as they do for Whites (Ashburn et al., 2003; Livingston, 2002).”
12. Formation, change, and contextualization of mental associations: determinants and principles of variations in implicit measures (2010, background): “Investigating implicit grow biases in targets of prejudice, Livingston (2002) found that black participants showed higher levels of implicit negativity toward their ingroup as a function of increased contact with whites.”
Sources of Implicit Attitudes (2004, background): “More dramatically, Livingston (2002) found that social standing had opposite influences on Blacks’ automatic and self-reported in-group bias.”
Black Americans' Implicit Racial Associations And Their Implications for Intergroup Judgment (2003, background): “, 2002; Spicer, 1999), and some research has offered compelling reasons for why such a bias exists (Livingston, 2002).”
Discrimination and the Implicit Association Test (2007, background): “In fact, validity for response latency measures has often relied on controlled judgments (e.g. Livingston, 2002; Rudman & Lee, 2002).”
African Americans' Implicit Racial Attitudes and the Depletion of Executive Function after Interracial Interactions. (2005, background): “One possible explanation is the internalization of the negative attitudes that white individuals hold about black Americans (Ashburn–Nardo et al., 2003; Livingston, 2002).”
The impact of multiculturalism versus color-blindness on racial bias (2004, background): “Recent work employing the IAT finds differences in the ease with which individuals can associate differing racial groups with positive and negative words and concepts (Dasgupta, McGhee, Greenwald, & Banaji, 2000; Livingston, 2002; Lowery, Hardin, & Sinclair, 2001; Richeson & Ambady, 2003).”
Exposure to Racial Out-Groups and Implicit Race Bias in the United States (2015, result): “This pattern aligns with prior lab results in which White participants typically express stronger implicit in-group bias than Black participants, but Black participants often express stronger explicit in-group bias than White participants (e.g., Ashburn-Nardo, 2010; Livingston, 2002).”
Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use. (2003, background): “IAT preferences for white over black have been found to be stronger for white than for black respondents, although the (weaker) preference for white does not appear to reverse itself among blacks (Nosek et al. 2002b; but see Livingston 2002).”
A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo (2004, result): “On the implicit (IAT) measure, however, the pattern was reversed: African Americans showed less favorable attitudes toward their own group in comparison with European Americans (see also Livingston, 2002).”
Threatened identities and interethnic interactions (2006, result): “Participants who were highly anxious about interacting with African Americans were three times more likely to be ‘‘no-shows’’ the following week when they believed the session involved interacting with African Americans compared to interacting with White Americans.”
Implicit Ingroup Favoritism, Outgroup Favoritism, and Their Behavioral Manifestations (2004, background): “Livingston (2002) assessed the extent to which African Americans believe that the mainstream American culture regards their ingroup negatively and examined the extent to which such beliefs correlated with Black participants’ implicit and explicit racial attitudes.”
The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: Exploring the Impact of Private Versus Public Contexts and the Response Latency Criterion on Pro-White and Anti-Black Stereotyping Among White Irish Individuals (2010, background): “…Implicit Association Test, or IAT, have indicated that white participants tend to show a relatively strong pro-white/anti-black bias (see Dasgupta, McGhee, & Greenwald, 2000; Greenwald et al., 2002; Monteith, Voils, & Ashburn-Nardo, 2001; Livingston, 2002; Ottaway, Hayden, & Oakes, 2001).”
Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. (2006, methodology): “Livingston, R. W., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). What are we really priming? Cue-based versus category-based processing of facial stimuli.”