Threatened identities and interethnic interactions

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity (2007, background): “However, because minorities are primarily concerned about being treated negatively because of their group membership, different group identities will remain salient even while they engage in activities to improve intergroup relations (Shelton et al., 2006; Vorauer, 2006).”
The challenge of leading on unstable ground: Triggers that activate social identity faultlines (2009, background): “A second qualitative study (99 events) involved a more geographically varied sample.”
Suffering from the possibility of status loss: Physiological responses to social identity threat in high status groups. (2009, result): “Although threats experienced by members of high-status groups (in terms of anxiety, or loss of material resources; see Shelton et al., 2006; Stephan & Stephan, 2000; see also Blascovich et al., 2002) have been examined in previous research, studies on social identity threat in high-status groups…”
Intergroup Anxiety in Interracial Interaction: The Role of Prejudice and Metastereotypes (2010, background): “studies (cf. Frey & Tropp, 2006; Shelton et al., 2006), though in all of these the political situation and race demographics are very different from South Africa.”