Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.

By Bertram Gawronski, Galen Bodenhausen. Psychological bulletin, 2006

2,552 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6119d51a6a537427bb425b0ef6040f25bb15a8b0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

On the distinction between rationality and intelligence: Implications for understanding individual differences in reasoning. (2012, background): “…thought processes Evans & Wason (1976); Wason & Evans (1975) Type 1 processes Type 2 processes Fodor (1983) Modular processes Central processes Gawronski & Bodenhausen (2006) Associative processes Propositional processes Haidt (2001) Intuitive system Reasoning system Johnson-Laird (1983)…”
Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: a theoretical framework and empirical review (2008, background): “Moreover, associative processes are generally assumed to be independent of conscious awareness and of one’s personal endorsement of an association as true or false (Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006).”
How Advergame Content Influences Explicit and Implicit Brand Attitudes: When Violence Spills Over (2013, background): “Although there is no agreement (Albarracı́n, Hart, and McCulloch 2006; Gawronski and Bodenhausen 2006b; Gawronski and LeBel 2008; Gawronski and Payne 2010; Horcajo, Brinol, and Petty 2010; Kruglanski and Dechesne 2006; Petty and Brinol 2008) on the structure and relationships between the two forms…”
Social Categorization and the Perception of Social Groups (2012, background): “However, as Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006, 2011) point out, it is certainly also possible that additional deliberation can simply serve to reinforce initial association-based impressions; this is particularly likely to happen in circumstances where there are motivational forces leading the…”
A functional-cognitive framework for attitude research (2013, background): “The second aim is to develop cognitive theories that describe the mental mechanisms by which prior experiences moderate evaluation (e.g., Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006; Petty & Cacioppo, 1986).”
Ten Frequently Asked Questions About Implicit Measures and Their Frequently Supposed, But Not Entirely Correct Answers (2009, background): “Second, the claim that only some of these associations are inherently personal whereas others are inherently extrapersonal (e.g., Olson & Fazio, 2004) implies that the representation of associations in memory can differ as a function of their source (Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006).”
Time for a Radical Reappraisal of Tourist Decision Making? Toward a New Conceptual Model (2016, background): “Implicit attitudes operate primarily within the experiential system, whereas explicit attitudes operate mainly within the analytical system (Gawronski and Bodenhausen 2006).”
Dual Process Th eories (2013, methodology): “…associative learning mechanism involving the formation of mental associations between the cooccurring stimuli, in contrast with a propositional learning mechanism involving the generation of mental propositions about the relation between co-occurring stimuli (e.g., Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006).”
The Implicit Prejudiced Attitudes of Teachers (2010, background): “The two types of attitude measures have been argued to tap different psychological processes that are nevertheless both important for the guidance of behavior, namely, associative versus propositional processes (Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006).”
Boys Don’t Play with Dolls: Mothers’ and Fathers’ Gender Talk during Picture Book Reading (2014, background): “indirectly express the belief that certain behaviors are more appropriate for either girls or boys (Gelman et al., 2004). Friedman and colleagues (2007) focused on more explicit and generalizing messages about gender, comments that confirm gender stereotypes (e.”
How Abusive Supervision Affects Workplace Deviance: A Moderated-Mediation Examination of Aggressiveness and Work-Related Negative Affect (2016, background): “Explicit social cognitions revolving around aggressive beliefs and attitudes are a potential explanatory mechanism of this relationship as they help capture and explain how people interpret and respond to their environment in an introspective and controlled manner (Bing et al. 2007; Frost et al. 200”