The impact of multiculturalism versus color-blindness on racial bias
By J. Richeson, Richard J Nussbaum. 2004
583 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93586fe5624589e4a5deb44c27a6fe5d9bc1532b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Bertram Gawronski
- John F. Dovidio
- M. Verkuyten
- Galen Bodenhausen
- Brian A. Nosek
- Efrén O. Pérez
- Nilanjana Dasgupta
- J. Richeson
In Sociology and Political Science
- Bertram Gawronski
- John F. Dovidio
- Brian A. Nosek
- M. Verkuyten
- Galen Bodenhausen
- Efrén O. Pérez
- Mahzarin R. Banaji
- Nilanjana Dasgupta
Citations in the corpus
- You deplete me: The cognitive costs of colorblindness on ethnic minorities (2012, background): “Reading colorblind messages leads to greater explicit and implicit prejudice among Whites (Richeson & Nussbaum, 2004), and ethnic minorities may be influenced by the negative attitudes that leak out through Whites' behavior towards them (Dovidio, Kawakami, & Gaertner, 2002).”
- Included but Invisible? Subtle Bias, Common Identity, and the Darker Side of “We” (2016, background): “Learning about the benefits of multiculturalism improves majority-group members' attitudes toward the outgroup (Richeson & Nussbaum, 2004; Wolsko, Park, Judd, & Wittenbrink, 2000) and promotes more constructive behaviors during intergroup interactions.”
- Multicultural recognition and ethnic minority rights: A social identity perspective (2006, methodology): “The experimental manipulations induced by the questionnaire were set up by following the procedure outlined by Wolsko et al. (2000) that has also been used by Richeson and Nussbaum (2004).”
- The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review (2007, background): “…, 2001; Ferguson & Bargh, 2003; Florack, Bless, & Piontkowski, 2003; Foroni & Mayr, 2005; Lowery, Hardin, & Sinclair, 2001; Mitchell, Nosek, & Banaji, 2003; Richeson & Ambady, 2003; Richeson & Nussbaum, 2004; Rudman, Ashmore, & Gary, 2001; Teachman & Woody, 2003; Wittenbrink et al., 2001).”
- The Associative–Propositional Evaluation Model: Theory, Evidence, and Open Questions (2011, result): “Yet, other studies found corresponding changes in both implicit and explicit evaluations (e.g., Olson & Fazio, 2001; Richeson & Nussbaum, 2004).”
- The Protestant Work Ethic: A Lay Theory with Dual Intergroup Implications (2006, background): “However, in other contexts (and for other individuals) the colorblind theory can be used in other ways (see Richeson & Nussbaum, 2004), for example, to deny the existence of racism and to blame disadvantaged groups for their disadvantage (e.g. Neville, Lilly, Duran, Lee, & Browne, 2000; Schofield,…”
- Ethnic group identification and group evaluation among minority and majority groups: testing the multiculturalism hypothesis. (2005, background): “However, although multiculturalism has been increasingly recommended as an effective intervention at societal and local levels, little is known about the effects (but see, e.g., Judd, Park, Ryan, Brauer, & Kraus, 1995; Richeson & Nussbaum, 2004; Wolsko, Park, Judd, & Wittenbrink, 2000).”
- Explicit Evidence on the Import of Implicit Attitudes: The IAT and Immigration Policy Judgments (2010, background): “Indeed, several researchers have examined the influence of contextual features on IAT responses, such as the type of information one is exposed to prior to completion of the IAT (e.g., Dasgupta and Greenwald 2001; Lowery et al. 2001; Richeson and Nussbaum 2004).”
- Refugee integration: Research and policy. (2018, unknown): “However, in intergroup contact situations between majority and minority groups there is also the danger that this construction of identity may be an instance of a color-blind ideology (Richeson & Nussbaum, 2004).”
- Lay Theories and Intergroup Relations (2006, background): “The colorblind theory that race differences are superficial, irrelevant, and uninformative bases to make judgments of people (e.g. Richeson & Nussbaum, 2004) suggests the prescription that people should be treated equally, thereby fitting with core values of numerous countries including the US…”
- Self-esteem and multiculturalism: An examination among ethnic minority and majority groups in the Netherlands (2009, methodology): “This procedure has been adopted in other studies (e.g., Richeson & Nussbaum, 2004), and is the one I used for this study.”
- Multicultural and Colorblind Ideology, Stereotypes, and Ethnocentrism among Black and White Americans (2007, background): “…multiculturalism versus colorblindness to improve intergroup relations would predict stereotype strength and (weaker) ethnocentr-ism as has been suggested in recent work (Judd, Park, Ryan, Brauer, & Kraus, 1995; Park & Judd, 2005; Richeson & Nussbaum, 2004; Verkuyten, 2005; Wolsko et al., 2000).”
- Positive Stereotypes Are Pervasive and Powerful (2015, background): “…promote a broader approach to cultural awareness and multiculturalism that allows identities to be valued without reducing people to their group membership may help foster an appreciation of the nuances associated with positive stereotypes (Plaut, Thomas, & Goren, 2009; Richeson & Nussbaum, 2004).”