Simultaneous Examination of the Antecedents and Consequences of Efficacy Beliefs at Multiple Levels of Analysis

By Gilad Chen, P. Bliese, Stephanie C Payne, Stephen J. Zaccaro, Sheila Simsarian Webber, John E. Mathieu, Dana Born. 2002

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/82f495006bf75ac743fb0b33fa35598e52442862

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Toward Conceptual Clarity (2013, background): “An interesting idea in this regard is the concept of multilevel homology (Chen & Bliese, 2002; Chen et al., 2002), which proposes that a concept may have different meanings and different relationships with other variables at multiple levels of analysis (e.”
The Accuracy of Significance Tests for Slope Variance Components in Multilevel Random Coefficient Models (2009, background): “For example, several studies report using sample sizes near 30 groups (Bunderson, 2003; Nauman & Bennett, 2000), 50 groups (Chen et al., 2002; Kidwell et al., 1997), 100 groups (Ployhart, Holtz, & Bliese, 2002; Yeo & Neal, 2004), or more (Choi, 2006; Jackson & Joshi, 2004).”
Leadership efficacy: Review and future directions (2008, background): “These findings supplement the well-established literature linking collective efficacy with group performance outcomes (Chen et al., 2002; Gully et al., 2002; Navon and Erez, 2005; Peterson et al., 2000).”
A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. (2004, methodology): “Analyses indicated that, for the most part, key linking processes were functionally equivalent (Kozlowski & Klein, 2000; Morgeson & Hofmann, 1999), exhibiting similar patterns of significant and nonsignificant relations among parallel constructs at both levels of analysis ( Chen et al., 2002; Widam”
Conceptual Framework and Statistical Procedures for Delineating and Testing Multilevel Theories of Homology (2005, background): “For instance, in a test of homology across levels involving a construct such as efficacy, one must accept that self-efficacy (an individual construct) and collective efficacy (a group-level construct) maintain enough theoretical similarity across levels to make a contrast of their correlates meaning”
Development and Preliminary Validation of the Collective Efficacy Questionnaire for Sports (2005, background): “Recently, Chen et al. (2002) found both similarities and dissimilarities between individual and team level sources and outcomes of efficacy beliefs, suggesting that the assumption of homology in models of efficacy should be revisited.”
Is What You See, What You Get? (2008, unknown): “…1994), military teams (Chen & Bliese, 2002), hospital nursing teams (Gibson, 1999, 2001b), hockey teams (Feltz & Lirgg, 1998), basketball teams (Chen et al., 2002), brainstorming teams (Prussia & Kinicki, 1996), and management simulations (Earley, Gibson, & Chen, 1999; Gibson, Randel, &…”
Self-efficacy and work-related performance: the integral role of individual differences. (2007, methodology): “However, a previous study—Chen et al. (2001)— evaluated the joint relationship of cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and self-efficacy to performance. Thus, it is important to highlight the ways in which our study contributes to the literature beyond the Chen et al. (2001) study in particular.”
The Efficacy Advantage: Factors Related to the Formation of Group Efficacy1 (2003, background): “…efficacy, a group's collective belief in its capabilities to perform a task (Gibson, 1999) has a demonstrated impact on group effectiveness (e.g., Chen et al. 2002; Durham, Knight & Locke, 1997; Earley, 1999a; Gibson, 1999; Greenlees, Nunn, & Graydon, 1999; Feltz & Lirgg, 1998; Lee, Tinsley &…”
The role of self-efficacy, goal, and affect in dynamic motivational self-regulation (2009, background): “Recently, scholars have begun to question whether self-efficacy, one’s belief in his or her capacity to perform (Bandura, 1986), plays the same role in motivational self-regulation at different levels of analyses (e.g., Chen & Bliese, 2002; Chen et al., 2002; Vancouver, Thompson, & Williams, 2001;”
At What Level (and in Whom) We Trust (2012, methodology): “For example, research on efficacy has used a central component in definitions to support fruitful examination of the construct across levels (Chen & Bliese, 2002; Chen et al., 2002; Gibson, 2001).”
Teaming Up: Linking Collaboration Networks, Collective Efficacy, and Student Achievement. (2012, background): “Research has indicated that collective efficacy affects organizational commitment and group performance (Chen et al., 2002; Riggs & Knight, 1994; Ross & Gray, 2006).”