The Declarative/Procedural Model of Lexicon and Grammar

By Michael T. Ullman. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2001

509 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/820b0d68d41b0e43748f8df059c91de792d8bad4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Fluency Training in the ESL Classroom: An Experimental Study of Fluency Development and Proceduralization (2011, unknown): “…well-known in cognitive psychology and neuroscience (e.g., Anderson, 1983; Anderson et al., 2004; Anderson & Lebiere, 1998; Squire, 1987, 1992), and has been applied to second language acquisition (e.g., De Jong, 2005; DeKeyser, 1997; Towell, 2002; Towell et al., 1996; Ullman, 2001a, 2001b, 2004).”
The past and future of the past tense. (2002, unknown): “Here we discuss three types of evidence for a distinction between lookup and concatenation, and connectionists’ attempts to provide alternative accounts (for reviews, see [3,4,14, 31 ]).”
Islands of Reliability for Regular Morphology: Evidence from Italian (2003, background): “Leaving aside Davis and Napoli’s claims regarding other Romance languages, even for Italian their template cannot explain every single Italian verb that has left or remained in the –ére class (Maiden 1995; Marotta 1997; Wright 1997).”
Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model. (2004, methodology): “Second, although there appear to be striking separations of function among the different brain areas involved in the two brain systems, it does not appear to be the case that all parts of each lobe subserve only one or the other system.”
Deficits in phonology and past-tense morphology: What's the connection? (2003, unknown): “The second discussion point is the issue of whether the difference between our findings and those of Ullman et al. (1997, in press) might be attributable to differences in patient samples. Even though all of the patients in both studies are described as nonfluent aphasics, they would inevitably diff”
Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational morphology: Observations from a comparison of English and French (2009, background): “A slightly different view is encapsulated within the Declarative/Procedural model (Ullman, 2001, 2004), where a mental lexicon of words and a mental grammar of rules are ascribed to the separate memory systems referred to in the name of the model. The model proposes that although both systems can un”
Specific language impairment is not specific to language: the procedural deficit hypothesis. (2005, unknown): “…factors such as frequency, in both expressive (Gopnik and Crago, 1991; Leonard et al., 1992b; Oetting and Horohov, 1997; Rice et al., 1995; Ullman and Gopnik, 1999; van der Lely and Ullman, 2001) and receptive (Gopnik, 1994; Ullman and Gopnik, 1999; van der Lely and Ullman, 1996) language tasks.”
Proficiency and working memory based explanations for nonnative speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence processing (2012, background): “…learners’ poorer ability to compute grammatical structures (compared to native speakers) but their relatively intact ability to learn lexical words, Ullman (2001) proposed that L2 learners increasingly rely on declarative memory as their age of first exposure to the target language increases, and…”
The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: the declarative/procedural model (2001, background): “According to the declarative/procedural model, regulars are real-time procedural/grammatical (af®xation) rule products, whereas irregulars are learned in and retrieved from associative declarative/ lexical memory (Ullman, 2001; Ullman et al., 1997).”
A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model (2001, background): “The basic premise of the declarative/procedural model is that aspects of the lexicon/grammar distinction are tied to the distinction between two well-studied brain memory systems — declarative and procedural memory — that have been implicated in non-language functions in humans and other animal”