Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model.

By Michael T. Ullman. Cognition, 2004

1,740 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1bf363311ee837339f80d62caa7b37b30757152

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Intrinsic motivation of Chinese learning in predicting online learning self-efficacy and flow experience relevant to students’ learning progress (2017, background): “Although the mechanisms underlying gender differences in language processing remain controversial in regard to declarative and procedural framework attributes, there have been some assumptions about gender differences in language acquisition and processing related to the superior declarative memory ”
Continuity and shallow structures in language processing (2006, background): “…availability of full parsing in late L2 acquisition is ultimately due to neurobiological changes occurring around puberty (as has been suggested by Ullman, 2004), or whether this is a secondary consequence of the increase in size and accessibility of relevant extragrammatical knowledge during…”
Specific language impairment is not specific to language: the procedural deficit hypothesis. (2005, positive): “…is, declarative memory could in principle be abnormal in PLD, perhaps due to the same factors that directly affect the procedural system brain structures, or perhaps as a result of abnormal development thanks to the close connections between the declarative and procedural systems (Ullman, 2004).”
Functional MRI of Language in Aphasia: A Review of the Literature and the Methodological Challenges (2007, background): “For example, procedural memory is probably important for ordering of phonemes during word retrieval and Springer for ordering of words in sentences (e.g., Nadeau & Crosson, 1977), and Ullman (2004) has suggested that Broca’s area is important in such procedural memory processes.”
Quantitative analyses in a multivariate study of language attrition: the impact of extralinguistic factors (2010, methodology): “Recent neurolinguistic findings about sex-based differences in lateralization (e.g. Kansaku and Kitazawa, 2001; Hill et al., 2006) and the reliance on declarative and procedural memory ( Ullman, 2004) also indicate the possibility of different strategies used for some tasks.”
Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities (2007, positive): “Second, the present explanation is framed totally within a lexicon that if so desired can be construed as a declarative memory in the sense of Ullman (2004).”
The Phonological Loop (2010, background): “…authors claim that there are several separate memory systems subserving the different levels of language processing (phonological, lexical, semantic, and syntactic; Caplan and Waters 1999; Ullman 2004), while others consider these systems as intrinsically associated between them (Lieberman 2002).”
The Declarative/Procedural Model (2020, background): “Although only implicit (not explicit) knowledge in L1 and L2 should rely on procedural memory, not all implicit knowledge should involve this system, since there are other implicit memory systems, and, as we have seen, declarative memory also subserves implicit knowledge (also see “The…”
DECOMPOSITION OF INFLECTED WORDS IN A SECOND LANGUAGE (2009, methodology): “An additional analysis was motivated by the hypothesis (Ullman, 2004 ) that women, even in their L1, rely more on the declarative memory system than men.”
Morphologically Complex Words in L1 and L2 Processing: Evidence from Masked Priming Experiments in English. (2008, background): “That stem-priming effects were either absent (in the case of inflection) or reduced (in the case of derivation) in the L2 groups confirms the claim that L2 processing relies less on combinatorial mechanisms than L1 processing (Ullman, 2004, 2005).”
Declarative and procedural memory as individual differences in second language acquisition* (2013, background): “The procedural memory system is supported by particular brain structures, including frontal lobe/basal ganglia circuits as well as certain portions of the cortex and the cerebellum (for more information, see Ullman, 2001, 2004).”
Proficiency and working memory based explanations for nonnative speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence processing (2012, background): “…of agreement morphology, three types of accounts have sought to explain L2 learners’ variable sensitivity to agreement: storage accounts (e.g., Ullman, 2001, 2004), which © Cambridge University Press 2012 0142-7164/12 $15.00 propose that L2 learners fail to decompose morphologically complex…”
Age of acquisition: its neural and computational mechanisms. (2007, background): “Indeed, some neuroimaging research has found that tasks involving syntactic processing show larger AoA effects than tasks involving semantic processing (Wartenburger et al., 2003; Weber-Fox & Neville, 1996). In a seminal study, WeberFox and Neville (1996) asked a group of Chinese–English bilingual i”
PEER INTERACTION AND CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR ACCURACY AND FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT (2012, methodology): “In addition to drawing on theories from cognitive psychology and SLA, the current study proposes a new perspective for CF research: the integration of monitoring in Levelt’s ( 1989 , 1999 ) speech-production model with declarative-procedural models (see Ullman, 2004 ).”