Development of an instrument to assess views on nature of science and attitudes toward teaching science

By Sufen Chen. 2006

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ced16cf4d02004e666c254fd719469fb5186f40

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

PRESERVICE TEACHERS’ VIEWS ABOUT NATURE OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT: AN INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIVE STUDY (2009, background): “These aspects are addressed in the science education standards documents in the three participating countries, and have been widely discussed in the NOS empirical studies (e.g., AAAS, 1990; 1993; Aikenhead & Ryan, 1992; Chen, 2006; Lederman, Abd-El-Khalick, Bell, & Schwartz, 2002; McComas & Olson, 1”
Strategic Facilitation of Problem-Based Discussion for Teacher Professional Development (2011, background): “It is not uncommon for teachers to hold conflicting beliefs about teaching and learning (Chen, 2006; Rousseau, 2004). For example, Bryan (2003) found that one perspective elementary school”
The Nature of Science and the Next Generation Science Standards: Analysis and Critique (2016, unknown): “…by Alshamrani (2008) which reviewed recommendations from multiple sources (Abd-El-Khalick, 2004; Abd-El-Khalick et al., 1998; Bell, 2004; Chen, 2006; Clough, 2000; Lederman, 1998; Lederman & Lederman, 2004; Liu & Lederman, 2002; McComas, 2004; Osborne, Collins, Ratcliffe, Millar, &…”
Revisiting the Translation of Nature of Science Understandings into Instructional Practice: Teachers' nature of science pedagogical content knowledge (2014, background): “More recently, Khaldi et al. (2008) assessed the NOS views of a sample of 280 Palestinian science teachers who completed the Views on Science and Education questionnaire (Chen, 2006).”