Role Efficacy, Role Clarity, and Role Performance Effectiveness

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Role ambiguity, role efficacy, and role performance: Multidimensional and mediational relationships within interdependent sport teams. (2002, methodology): “…the aforementioned research has focused mainly on individuals performing sport tasks independently and not interdependently with teammates, recent research by Bray and Brawley (2000, 2002) also found a positive relationship between role efficacy and role performance in collegiate basketball.”
Social psychology of exercise and sport (2005, background): “It has similar sources and properties of other efficacy beliefs such as task self-efficacy and collective efficacy (Bandura 1997), but it has been found to be conceptually and empirically distinct from these efficacy beliefs (Bray and Brawley 2002).”
The Development and Validation of the Feedback Orientation Scale (FOS) (2010, background): “Having role clarity can have an important impact on an employee’s ability to effectively function in his or her job and can lead to better job performance (Bray & Brawley, 2002).”
Positive organisation : the role of leader behaviour in work engagement and retention : original research (2011, result): “…(2006) found that the role ambiguity items of this measure should be renamed ‘role clarity’ and this is substantiated in other research (Beehr, Glazer, Fischer, Linton, & Hansen, 2009; Bray & Brawley, 2002) and therefore, for this study these items were utilised because role clarity is of interest.”