Interpersonal Stratification: Status, Power, and Subordination

By Susan T. Fiske. 2010

438 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c286e7d307e9898cde25ecb4b59ec7128271479

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

HEAVY IS THE HEAD THAT WEARS THE CROWN: AN ACTOR-CENTRIC APPROACH TO DAILY PSYCHOLOGICAL POWER, ABUSIVE LEADER BEHAVIOR, AND PERCEIVED INCIVILITY (2017, background): ““Power” is often defined as the asymmetric control over valued resources (Emerson, 1962; Fiske, 2010; Keltner et al., 2003; Magee & Galinsky, 2008), or, more”
Moving from Abuse to Reconciliation: A Power-Dependence Perspective on When and How a Follower Can Break the Spiral of Abuse (2017, background): “Individuals are more attuned to situational cues about their own valued goals and resources than about others’ (e.g., Fiske, 2010; Galinsky et al., 2008; Overbeck & Park, 2001).”
Pronoun Use Reflects Standings in Social Hierarchies (2014, background): “Thus, similar to Study 5, status is defined as the degree of respect and admiration an individual receives relative to others (Anderson & Kilduff, 2009a, 2009b; Blau, 1964; Fiske, 2010; Ridgeway & Walker, 1995; see Cheng et al., 2013, for review).”
THE DOWNFALL OF EXTRAVERTS AND RISE OF NEUROTICS: THE DYNAMIC PROCESS OF STATUS ALLOCATION IN TASK GROUPS (2013, background): “, 2001; Bales, Strodtbeck, Mills, & Roseborough, 1951; Berger, Fisek, Norman, & Zelditch, 1977), the interpersonal interactions that reify and reinforce status hierarchies (Fiske, 2010; Mazur, 1985; Ridgeway, 1987; Ridgeway & Berger, 1986), the benefits that flow to individuals with high status (Bal”
CEO Materialism and Corporate Social Responsibility (2016, background): “Status is defined in the literature as the prestige, respect, and esteem that a party has in the eyes of others (Fiske 2010).”
Gender Rules: Same- and Cross-Gender Friendships Norms (2012, background): “Given women’s relatively lower economic standing and social power (Fiske 2009), they may rely more on supportive relationships, and their need for informal ties may result in greater demands and expectations for these crucial bonds.”
The Social Ladder: A Rank-Based Perspective on Social Class (2013, background): “Our theory of social class rank posits that judgments about one’s own rank are determined by local comparisons—that is, comparisons of observable symbols of others’ income, education, and occupation status to one’s own (e.g., Fiske, 2010).”
Social psychological perspectives on the legitimation of social inequality: Past, present and future (2013, neutral): “43, 229–237 (2013) or (at the most macro level of analysis) even entire nations or societies (Fiske, 2010; Wakslak, Jost, & Bauer, 2011).”
A bed of thorns: Female leaders and the self-reinforcing cycle of illegitimacy (2016, background): “…and attitudes toward women Stereotyping disadvantaged groups is a powerful way to justify the status quo and maintain hierarchical arrangements (Fiske, 2010; Glick & Fiske, 1999), and backlash against female leaders helps perpetuate negative cultural stereotypes and unequal gender relations…”
A Road Map for an Emerging Psychology of Social Class (2012, background): “Researchers have long studied the influence of social power on psychological experience (Fiske, 1993, 2010; Guinote & Vescio, 2010).”
Mechanisms of social cognition. (2012, background): “Knowledge of status also helps us to keep track of who is currently allied with whom (Fiske 2010).”
Who Takes the Floor and Why (2011, background): “This relationship between volubility and power may exist because the amount of attention that is paid to an individual in social groups is directly related to that individual’s ability to control the behavior or opinions of others (Fiske, 2010).”
The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments (2012, background): “…as a group process (e.g., Chemers, 1997, 2001), and has been stimulated by leadership research that focuses on power (e.g., Fiske & Dépret, 1996; see Fiske, 2010), gender (e.g., Eagly & Carli, 2007; Eagly & Karau, 2002; Eagly, Karau, & Makhijani, 1995; see Wood & Eagly, 2010), social cognition…”
Respect in Organizations: Feeling Valued as “We” and “Me” (2017, background): “However, status is often defined not simply as the value accorded to a person but as a social stratification or one’s position in a hierarchy, such that status “ranks people vertically” (Fiske, 2010: 941).”