Transactive Memory Systems: Current Issues and Future Research Directions

By Kyle Lewis, Benjamin Herndon. Organ. Sci., 2011

430 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b56779be035dcfa3074569e8930da9c5ae01144

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Information Systems and Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The “online brain”: how the Internet may be changing our cognition (2019, background): “…on aspects that are not immediately retrievable, and thus remember these better in the future These findings seem to support the emergent hypotheses that relying on the Internet for factual memory storage may actually produce cognitive benefit in other areas, perhaps by 54 45 the Internet’s…”
Mapping 50 Years of Small Group Research Through Small Group Research (2020, background): “Although a substantial link has not been established between them (despite one study showing a positive correlation; Solansky, 2008), researchers have theoretically argued for their relationship (Carson et al., 2007; Lewis & Herndon, 2011).”
Respect as an engine for new ideas: Linking respectful engagement, relational information processing and creativity among employees and teams (2015, background): “Members then draw on each other’s experiences and expertise in enriching conversations (Lewis and Herndon, 2011).”
The riddle of heterarchy: : power transitions in cross-functional teams (2014, background): “One factor that may aid in this process is for a team to develop an accurate and comprehensive transactive memory system (Ellis, 2006; Lewis & Herndon, 2011).”
Distributed Cognition in Top Management Teams and Organizational Ambidexterity (2017, background): “Consistent with Lewis and Herndon (2011), we conclude that considering specialization, credibility, and coordination separately is not an appropriate basis for empirical analysis of transactive memory systems in top management teams.”
Knowledge Internalization and Product Development in Family Firms: When Relational and Affective Factors Matter (2016, background): “First, over time, entrepreneurial families tend to recognize and codify a shared understanding of who knows what within the family, or a family’s transactive memory system—TMS (Lewis & Herndon, 2011; Salvato & Melin, 2008).”