Facilitation of Conditioned Fear Extinction by Systemic Administration or Intra-Amygdala Infusions of d-Cycloserine as Assessed with Fear-Potentiated Startle in Rats

By D. Walker, K. Ressler, K. Lu, Michael Davis. Journal of Neuroscience, 2002

818 citations recorded by the source corpus.

NMDA receptor antagonists block conditioned fear extinction when injected systemically and also when infused directly into the amygdala. Here we evaluate the ability of d-cycloserine (DCS), a partial agonist at the strychnine-insensitive glycine-recognition site on the NMDA receptor complex, to facilitate conditioned fear extinction after systemic administration or intra-amygdala infusions. Rats received 10 pairings of a 3.7 sec light and a 0.4 mA footshock (fear conditioning). Fear-potentiated startle (increased startle in the presence vs the absence of the light) was subsequently measured before and after 30, 60, or 90 presentations of the light without shock (extinction training). Thirty non-reinforced light presentations produced modest extinction, and 60 or 90 presentations produced nearly complete extinction (experiment 1). DCS injections (3.25, 15, or 30 mg/kg) before 30 non-reinforced light exposures dose-dependently enhanced extinction (experiment 2) but did not influence fear-potentiated startle in rats that did not receive extinction training (experiment 3). These effects were blocked by HA-966, an antagonist at the glycine-recognition site (experiment 4). Neither DCS nor HA-966 altered fear-potentiated startle when injected before testing (experiment 5). The effect of systemic administration was mimicked by intra-amygdala DCS (10 μg/side) infusions (experiment 6). These results indicate that treatments that promote NMDA receptor activity after either systemic or intra-amygdala administration promote the extinction of conditioned fear.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7917a5167ad4a980360d3088b4f4fe5d45a795b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

  1. Elizabeth A. Phelps
  2. Gregory J. Quirk
  3. Joseph E LeDoux
  4. Scott L. Rauch
  5. Mohammed R. Milad
  6. Karyn M. Myers
  7. Mauricio R. Delgado
  8. F. Gonzalez-Lima

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Elizabeth A. Phelps
  2. Gregory J. Quirk
  3. Joseph E LeDoux
  4. Mohammed R. Milad
  5. Scott L. Rauch
  6. R. Pitman
  7. Denis Paré
  8. Tor D. Wager

In Developmental Neuroscience

  1. Gregory J. Quirk
  2. Mohammed R. Milad
  3. Joseph E LeDoux
  4. Karyn M. Myers
  5. M. Bouton
  6. Michael Davis

Citations in the corpus