Triangulating Principal Effectiveness

By Jason A. Grissom, Susanna Loeb. 2011

315 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/786c33d378afe51bfa002b7839acd98666db62da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Information Systems and Management

Citations in the corpus

The New Educational Accountability: Understanding the Landscape of Teacher Evaluation in the Post-NCLB Era (2016, background): “…suggests that principals’ managerial activities have a stronger relationship with school performance than do their instructional leadership tasks (Grissom and Loeb 2011), this information can help school leaders target professional development, improve school performance (Steinberg and Sartain…”
Trust in principals, leaders’ focus on instruction, teacher collaboration, and teacher self-efficacy: testing a multilevel mediation model (2020, background): “…of time to managerial leadership has a stronger impact on student achievement than their allocation of time to instructional leadership (e.g. Grissom and Loeb, 2011; Grissom, Loeb and Master, 2013; May, Huff and Goldring, 2012), many researchers provided evidence that instructional…”
The Effect of Principal Behaviors on Student, Teacher, and School Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2019, methodology): “Principal Behaviors We required that all included studies model at least one principal behavior as a predictor within the five categories articulated by Grissom and Loeb (2011) to topologize principal behaviors.”
Systematic Review of Key Leader Practices Found to Influence Student Achievement (2016, background): “In this study, the authors identified and defined a latent construct from exploratory factor analysis as “organizational management” (Grissom & Loeb, 2011, p. 1,106) that includes measures of school safety, managing the budget, and dealing with staff concerns.”
New Thinking about Instructional Leadership (2010, background): “Furthermore, evalua- tions of principals by their assistant principals confirm this finding (Grissom and Loeb 2009).”