Team Reflexivity, Development of Shared Task Representations, and the Use of Distributed Information in Group Decision Making

By Wendy P. van Ginkel, R. Tindale, D. van Knippenberg. 2009

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Communication, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/783d36e6fa9e942d5a5dddd1c213383071e4a1cb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Wendy P. van Ginkel
2. D. van Knippenberg
3. M. Schippers
4. W. V. Ginkel
5. Julija N. Mell
6. Udo Konradt
7. Astrid C. Homan
8. M. West

In Communication

1. Wendy P. van Ginkel
2. D. van Knippenberg
3. M. Schippers
4. M. West
5. Astrid C. Homan
6. W. V. Ginkel
7. J. Dawson
8. A. Pieterse

In Social Psychology

1. D. van Knippenberg
2. M. Schippers
3. Wendy P. van Ginkel
4. J. Dawson
5. M. West
6. Julija N. Mell
7. Astrid C. Homan
8. A. Pieterse

Citations in the corpus

• A Diversity Mindset Perspective on Inclusive Leadership (2021, background): “In a similar vein, van Ginkel, Tindale, and van Knippenberg (2009) showed that reflexivity helped team members with different understandings of the task to converge on a shared understanding of the importance of information elaboration.”
• Diversity in goal orientation, team reflexivity, and team performance (2011, background): “Therefore, we focused on a factor that has been argued to be particularly instrumental in creating shared understanding: team reflexivity (van Ginkel et al., 2009; West, 1996).”
• A Tale of Two Factions: Why and When Factional Demographic Faultlines Hurt Board Performance (2015, background): “…we propose that board reflexivity entails a reduced reliance on heuristic cues and is likely to foster a reframing of cognitive representations toward a shared frame of reference among board members (cf. Schippers, Den Hartog, Koopman, & van Knippenberg, 2008; van Ginkel et al., 2009; West, 2000).”
• Effects of guided reflexivity and team feedback on team performance improvement: The role of team regulatory processes and cognitive emergent states (2015, methodology): “These results expand research that has focused mainly on the mediating role of task knowledge (van den Bossche et al., 2011; van Ginkel et al., 2009; van Ginkel & van Knippenberg, 2009).”
• Past, present, and potential future of team diversity research: From compositional diversity to emergent diversity (2016, background): “…sharedness of understanding through a process of team reflexivity may address such disruptive influences (Nederveen Pieterse et al., 2011; van Ginkel et al., 2009) – and moreover that building concentrations of team knowledge in some members may provide a productive alternative to shared…”
• Diversity faultlines, shared objectives, and top management team performance (2011, background): “…may also be achieved through a process of team reflexivity – collectively reflecting on and learning from team process and performance to reach a more shared and adaptive understanding of team process and team objectives (van Ginkel and van Knippenberg, 2009; van Ginkel et al., 2009; West, 1996).”