Testing the Structure of Public Service Motivation in Korea: A Research Note

By Sangmook Kim. 2009

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77b50834ae8fc024a82074bfbbafc61744e4e068

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Public Administration

Citations in the corpus

Public sector motivation ad fonts : Personality traits as antecedents of the motivation to serve the public interest (2017, methodology): “This scale is very much based on the original one developed by Perry (1996), but modifies the three items measuring APM to get a better grasp of the individual’s predisposition to participate in policy formulation and implementation processes (Kim, 2009a).”
Red Tape, Resigned Satisfaction, Public Service Motivation, and Negative Employee Attitudes and Behaviors (2015, methodology): “An 11-item revised measure of Perry (1996) previously tested by Kim (2009) and Giauque et al. (2012) was used to measure four dimensions of Quratulain and Khan 317 PSM.”
The Psychological Mechanisms of Public Service Motivation (2016, methodology): “To develop full content-valid items for the Chinese version of the PSM Scale, we conducted an extensive review of the literature on PSM (Kim, 2009, 2011; Perry, 1996; Vandenabeele, 2008a).”
Work-Related Stressors and Health-Related Outcomes in Public Service (2015, background): “Although scholars show increasing interest in the PSM research, the generalizability of Perry’s (1996) original scale is limited due to different social and institutional backgrounds (Kim, 2009; Vandenabeele, 2008a).”
When Does Public Service Motivation Fuel the Job Satisfaction Fire? The Joint Moderation of Person–Organization Fit and Needs–Supplies Fit (2015, background): “2006), Italy (Cerase and Farinella 2009), Malta (Camilleri 2006), Netherland (Steijn 2008), South Korea (Kim 2009), Switzerland (Ritz 2009), and the United Kingdom (Coyle-Shapiro and Kessler 2003).”
Organizational Control Systems and Pay-for-Performance in the Public Service (2013, background): “Recently, evidence for the validity of the public service motivation concept beyond the US has been provided (Kim, 2009; Ritz, 2009).”