How Soy Labeling Influences Preference and Taste
By Brian Wansink, S. Park, S. Sonka, M. Morganosky. 2000
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Using a “Phantom Ingredient” taste test, this article demonstrates how the use of soy labels and health claims on a package negatively biased taste perceptions and attitudes toward a food erroneously thought to contain soy. Consumers who ate products which mentioned soy on the package described the taste more grainy, less flavorful, and as having a strong aftertaste compared to those who ate the product but saw no soy label. Yet, while putting “soy” on a package negatively influenced taste-conscious consumers, when combined with a health claim, it improved attitudes among consumers who are health-conscious, natural food lovers, or dieters. Our results and discussion provide better direction for researchers who work with ingredient labeling as well as for marketers who work with soybean products.
Subfields: Food Science, Marketing, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/768ebc48df1387ae510702e6b323c373a52a46d9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Food Science
In Marketing
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- The Influence of Color and Label Information on Flavor Perception (2009, background): “Labeling information has also been shown to modulate flavor perception (Lee et al. 2006; Makens 1965; Olson and Dover 1978; Wansink et al. 2000, 2005; Wardle and Solomons 1994; though see Goerlitz and Delwiche 2004).”
- An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior (2012, background): “Wells and Petty (1980) show that overt movements can impact cognitive activity depending on associations built up over time between these movements and their signals.”